What is the Total Work Against Gravity for a Laborer Carrying Sacks of Rice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter playlistism
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total work done against gravity by a laborer carrying five sacks of rice, first determine the force exerted by the sacks. Each sack weighs 50 kg, which translates to a force of 490 N (using the conversion 1 kg = 9.8 N). The total weight carried for one sack is the sum of the laborer's weight (600 N) and the sack's weight (490 N), totaling 1090 N. The work done against gravity for each sack is calculated as work = force x distance, resulting in 1090 N x 3.5 m = 3,815 J per sack. Therefore, for five sacks, the total work done is 3,815 J x 5 = 19,075 J.
playlistism
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A laborer who weighs 600N is to carry 5 sacks of rice from the ground to the second floor of a storehouse. If the distance betweeen floors is 3.5m and the weight of each sack is 50kg of force, find the total work done against gravity if the laborer carries only one sack at a time.

Include your solution please. I really don't get this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump, please i really need help
 
anyone use this forum ?
 
1. You posted in the wrong forum (it has been moved). Notice that the 2nd forum listed from the TOP is the Homework/Coursework forum.

2. Look at the guidelines required in the Homework forum. You can't just ask someone to do the whole problem for you. You must show what you have attempted, what you know, and where exactly did you get stuck. No one will do your homework for you.

Unless you do that, not many people here will help you.

Zz.
 
I will make one hint -- double check the question. Kg is not a unit of force or weight.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top