What is the True Quantum of Nature and its Relationship to Mass and Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Atrius
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pull
AI Thread Summary
Gravity is identified as the only invisible force that exclusively "pulls," unlike other forces that can push or pull. Electromagnetism exhibits dual effects based on charge, while the strong force behaves differently at varying distances. The discussion highlights that gravity's unique nature makes it the most noticeable force, as it remains uncancelled in the broader context. Njorl introduces the concept of Local Infinitesimal Motion (LIM), suggesting that gravity's forces are quantized at an infinitesimal level, leading to a net "pull." This framework defines the true quantum of nature and distinguishes between potential and kinetic mass.
Atrius
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I was just thinking, and gravity, is the only invisible force that "pulls" everything else i can think of, besides magnetism, is a "push". can anyone else think of anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most forces are both. Electromagnetism has opposite effects based on charge. The strong force pushes things that are close, pulls things that are farther, then has negligible efect at long distance. Gravity just pulls. This is why it is the most noticeable force ... it is uncancelled in the grand scheme of things.

Njorl
 
To every force, there is an equal and opposite force. But for gravity, these two forces are lock-in together (quantized) at the infinitesimal region of spacetime. And these two forces are not exactly equal in magnitude or exactly opposite in direction giving rise to a net effect of only "pull."
 
The interaction of these two forces at the infinitesimal region of space creates a Local Infinitesimal Motion (LIM). This LIM is the square of energy, E, given by the following:

E^2 = F_i \times r_i \cdot F_j \times r_j

The square of energy can be called the true quantum of nature. This true quantum gives the definition of two kinds of mass: the potential mass (same as inertial and gravitational mass) and the kinetic mass (which is really the mass component of momentum (linear or angular)).
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top