What is the Uncertainty in Wavelength for an Excited Atomic State?

chill_factor
Messages
898
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



An excited atomic state has a lifetime of 1 ms.

What is the uncertainty in its energy?

The photon emitted during its decay is 550 nm in wavelength. What is the uncertainty and fractional uncertainty in its wavelength?

Homework Equations



ΔEΔt≥hbar/2

The Attempt at a Solution



a. Straightforward plugging into the equation.

ΔE = hbar/(2Δt) = 5.25x10^-32

b. Use ΔE=hΔf to find the frequency.

Δf = 79.6 s^-1

if I were to plug this into ΔλΔf=c, it results in a very large Δλ which is unphysical.

Δλ = ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that is the right method. the result is not a wavelength, but an uncertainty in the wavelength, and it should be a fraction of 500nm
 
The resulting uncertainty is in the hundreds of meters though =(
 
While it's true that ##\lambda f = c##, it doesn't follow that ##\Delta \lambda \Delta f=c##.
 
work out the energy associated with the transition, then work out the ratio of the uncertainty of the energy and the energy of the transition. the energy is related to the wavelength of a particle through the dispersion relation. assume a non relativistic electron's dispersion relation, and work out the wavelength uncertainty from there.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top