What is the width of the single slit used in the experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the width of a single slit used in a diffraction experiment involving laser light with a wavelength of 610 nm. The distance between the first-order maxima is given as 4.00 mm, and the participant initially misapplied the formula for locating minima instead of focusing on the maxima. Clarification is provided that the question pertains to the first-order maxima, not the second minima, emphasizing that maxima do not lie directly between minima. The correct approach involves understanding the relationship between the slit width and the diffraction pattern produced. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the slit width based on the provided parameters.
2Pac
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
A single slit diffracts laser light of wavelength 610 nm onto a screen 2.25 m away. The distance between the two first-order maxima on either side of the central peak is 4.00 mm. How wide is the slit?

Anyone give me some help? i got an answer of .001029m and apparently this isn't correct. i used the formula for locating the minima a\cdot \sin(\theta) = (\lambda) . Since the second minima is located where (\lambda) is multiplied by 2. i multiplied the equation on the right side by 3/2 assuming the maxima would be found between both minima.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2Pac said:
Since the second minima is located where (\lambda) is multiplied by 2.

The question doesn't ask you about the second minima. It asks about the first minima.
 
No, the question asks about the first order maxima and it would not make sense for it to be asking about the center maxima because it is in the center. The intensity graph would look something like this (where the large hump is in the centerline of the slit):
 

Attachments

  • ah.gif
    ah.gif
    1.9 KB · Views: 553
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top