Valid point. I don't see any gearbox that would reduce revs, but I won't rule it out.Averagesupernova said:They will spin too fast for any clothing wringer I have been around.
No way. There are no heavy-duty, mechanical, moving components in a TV of any decade.giokrutoi said:mixer may be but I think it may be part of tv
I love making new from old stuff that's allAveragesupernova said:Just curious, why would you have thought surveying equipment? What made your mind go there?
Pretty sure this was directed at me.Averagesupernova said:Just curious, why would you have thought surveying equipment? What made your mind go there?
Clearly it should be Aboveaveragesupernova.![]()
I figure that's really more of the cooling mechanism for the motor.Jeff Rosenbury said:I like the mixer idea. The spinning plastic part could (with gearing) spin a bowl. The fins could engage for different gear ratios.
Try to find a part number on the motor somewhere. from that you might be able to cross reference the equipment manufacturer.giokrutoi said:and how can I make it work
I must have missed something.sophiecentaur said:The two different drives taken from the motor suggest a low speed, reversible, high torque drive at one end (as people have already said) and a high speed takeoff dog on the other end
There is a worm gear on the left and a straight 'dog' on the other end; could be a 10:1 difference in final speeds of the two drives.DaveC426913 said:And how do you figure one is low speed and the other is high-speed?
sophiecentaur said:There is a worm gear on the left and a straight 'dog' on the other end; could be a 10:1 difference in final speeds of the two drives.
Your scale is off by an order of magnitude.rbelli1 said: