What Physics Principle Explains Why a Balloon Shoots Out When Air Rushes Out?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nuha99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balloon Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics principles explaining why a balloon shoots out air when released. It highlights the relevance of Newton's second law, particularly in the context of conservation of momentum, while also considering the role of pressure differences inside and outside the balloon. The conversation notes that the balloon's behavior resembles rocket propulsion, where the high-pressure air escapes to a lower pressure area, creating thrust. There is debate over the applicability of Newton's third law, with some arguing that it does not directly apply since the balloon does not exert force on the escaping air molecules. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards Newton's second law as the primary explanation for the balloon's movement.
Nuha99
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When the air rush out of a balloon, it shoots out. What physics principle is responsible for this behavior?

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution




Is it due to Newton's 2 nd law or 3 rd law??

We can compare this to a rocket propulsion. We can explain this using Newton's second law (conservation of momentum when Fnet = 0). However, it is true only if net force = 0. But we know that the balloon also will shoot up, if the balloon's open end is pointing down. How do I explain this because now force of gravity is acting on the system.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Huh? I don't think you need take that approach at all, because a blown-up balloon is a very high pressure confined area, by 'letting' it go, you're allowing the pressure to 'equilibrate?' (is that a word? :P), basically the air in the balloon is bieng crushed together, and when you let it go it's free to move apart to an area of low pressure (where it wants to be)
 


It is a combination of the two. If you draw a free-body diagram at the nozzle, you have two components on each side. There are pressure forces on each side, high inside the balloon, and ambient outside. Multiplied by the area causes a net force.

You also have mass flow, which causes thrust. This can all be lumped into conservation of momentum. It is a textbook problem when discussing that topic in fluid mechanics.
 


So force on air molecules is some thing like, (Pin - Patm) * A where A is the area of the balloon's nozzle. Since this force is caused by pressure difference, and balloon itself did not exert this force on the molecules, can we say that Newton's 3 rd law is not at work here?

I still think, only Newton's 2 nd law is the one causing the balloon to fly backward. I vaguely remember doing a problem of rocket propulsion where we considered the force of gravity. We had a differential equation and we found the velocity of the rocket after some time has elapsed.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top