What physics will you use to find the speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deanine3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Speed
AI Thread Summary
To find the speed of a car rolling down a 50 m hill, the conservation of energy principle is applied, equating gravitational potential energy (PE) at the top to kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom. The relevant equations are PE = mgh and KE = 1/2 mv^2. Since the car starts from rest, its initial kinetic energy is zero, and at the bottom, all potential energy converts to kinetic energy. By setting mgh equal to 1/2 mv^2 and simplifying, the final speed is calculated using v = √(2gh), resulting in approximately 31.3 m/s. The discussion clarifies the steps in deriving the speed and addresses confusion about manipulating the equations.
deanine3
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a car starts from rest and rolls down a hill that is 50 m high. You are going to find the speed of the car at the bottom of the hill. What physics will you use to find the speed? Now find the speed.


Homework Equations


KE= 1/2mv^2
PE= mgh
Speed= distance x time

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to start since there is so little information. 50m (height) x 9.8 m/s^2 (gravity)= 500 m^2/s^ but is this PE? KE? I don't have mass so I don't think its PE, and I'm sure it's not KE.
What I know: its initial velocity is 0, height is 50m, since it is "falling" it is under the influence of gravity 9.8 m/s^2.
If it is falling 50 m at 9.8 m/s that's 5.102 seconds "falling"? So the speed is 5.102s x 50m = 255.01 m/s? Is this correct? Am I along the right lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a conservation problem. Choose the bottom of the hill as h=0. This will make solving for the unknown easy, even though you can choose h=0 at the top if you wish.

So, initially the car is at rest, so it has zero kinetic energy. Since I took h=0 at the bottom, the car has gravitational potential energy at the top. At the bottom, the car will have some final kinetic energy and zero gravitational potential energy since h=0 there.

So simply set up your equations and solve for v:

<br /> \begin{gathered}<br /> K_o + U_o = K_f + U_f \hfill \\<br /> U_g = K_f \hfill \\<br /> mgh = \tfrac{1}<br /> {2}mv^2 \hfill \\<br /> gh = \tfrac{1}<br /> {2}v^2 \hfill \\<br /> v = \sqrt {2(9.8\tfrac{m}<br /> {{s^2 }})(50m)} \hfill \\<br /> v \approx 31.3\tfrac{m}<br /> {s} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} <br />
 
I think I am getting however, how do you take out the 1/2 from the v^2 side of the equation? I don't see where it went.
 
or are both sides multiplied by 2?
 
deanine3 said:
or are both sides multiplied by 2?

Yes. Then you are taking the square root of 2gh to get v. :smile:
 
Ok, I really think I have it! When you divide by 2, it becomes 2gh=v^2. The v^2 becomes v=square root sign. Then, under the square root sign you plug in the 2 (from the previous division), gravity, and the height! This is slowly making sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top