What physics will you use to find the speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deanine3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Speed
AI Thread Summary
To find the speed of a car rolling down a 50 m hill, the conservation of energy principle is applied, equating gravitational potential energy (PE) at the top to kinetic energy (KE) at the bottom. The relevant equations are PE = mgh and KE = 1/2 mv^2. Since the car starts from rest, its initial kinetic energy is zero, and at the bottom, all potential energy converts to kinetic energy. By setting mgh equal to 1/2 mv^2 and simplifying, the final speed is calculated using v = √(2gh), resulting in approximately 31.3 m/s. The discussion clarifies the steps in deriving the speed and addresses confusion about manipulating the equations.
deanine3
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a car starts from rest and rolls down a hill that is 50 m high. You are going to find the speed of the car at the bottom of the hill. What physics will you use to find the speed? Now find the speed.


Homework Equations


KE= 1/2mv^2
PE= mgh
Speed= distance x time

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to start since there is so little information. 50m (height) x 9.8 m/s^2 (gravity)= 500 m^2/s^ but is this PE? KE? I don't have mass so I don't think its PE, and I'm sure it's not KE.
What I know: its initial velocity is 0, height is 50m, since it is "falling" it is under the influence of gravity 9.8 m/s^2.
If it is falling 50 m at 9.8 m/s that's 5.102 seconds "falling"? So the speed is 5.102s x 50m = 255.01 m/s? Is this correct? Am I along the right lines?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a conservation problem. Choose the bottom of the hill as h=0. This will make solving for the unknown easy, even though you can choose h=0 at the top if you wish.

So, initially the car is at rest, so it has zero kinetic energy. Since I took h=0 at the bottom, the car has gravitational potential energy at the top. At the bottom, the car will have some final kinetic energy and zero gravitational potential energy since h=0 there.

So simply set up your equations and solve for v:

<br /> \begin{gathered}<br /> K_o + U_o = K_f + U_f \hfill \\<br /> U_g = K_f \hfill \\<br /> mgh = \tfrac{1}<br /> {2}mv^2 \hfill \\<br /> gh = \tfrac{1}<br /> {2}v^2 \hfill \\<br /> v = \sqrt {2(9.8\tfrac{m}<br /> {{s^2 }})(50m)} \hfill \\<br /> v \approx 31.3\tfrac{m}<br /> {s} \hfill \\ <br /> \end{gathered} <br />
 
I think I am getting however, how do you take out the 1/2 from the v^2 side of the equation? I don't see where it went.
 
or are both sides multiplied by 2?
 
deanine3 said:
or are both sides multiplied by 2?

Yes. Then you are taking the square root of 2gh to get v. :smile:
 
Ok, I really think I have it! When you divide by 2, it becomes 2gh=v^2. The v^2 becomes v=square root sign. Then, under the square root sign you plug in the 2 (from the previous division), gravity, and the height! This is slowly making sense.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top