What to do when language in a text gets rough

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language Text
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of understanding a rigorous pure math textbook, particularly the difficulty in deciphering theorems and their conditions. The user expresses frustration with the book's complexity, which initially seemed appealing but has become overwhelming. Suggestions for improvement include exploring alternative texts that explain concepts more clearly, re-reading sections for better comprehension, attempting to complete proofs independently, and seeking help from a professor. A specific recommendation is made to consider "Arfken and Weber" for clearer language and explanations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of finding resources that balance rigor with clarity in mathematical learning.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
specifically a pure math book? I'm reading this textbook and sometimes it takes me so long to figure out what the theorem or something is actually saying. I can't tell whether parts of it are supposed or are conditions or if they're using some characteristic of another proven part of the concept.

:cry:

it's so annoying cause for about 12 pages i really liked this book due to its rigor now its rigor is killing me.

its this one

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521664020/?tag=pfamazon01-20

if anyone knows a book like this, that's develops all the concepts from scratch, but is clearer I would very much like to know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do a varity of things:

1) Pick up a new book on the subject and compare wording.
2) Re-read.
3) Attempt to complete the proof before the text gives it to you (this is a skill that you should start working on anyway, because many of the graduate math texts I have used tend to assume you can prove the almost every theorem they give you without too much insight).
4) Ask a professor to assist you are stumped.
 
in particular since it is a math book u should tend to be more intutive than looking for proofs in the book once u satisfy urdelf with an example then probably u will fell lot better.
 
You've chosen an old book to look into. Try Arfken and Weber. The words are more common.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top