Engineering What Voltage Should Be Applied to Achieve a Change in Capacitor Energy of 4uJ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the voltage required to achieve a change in capacitor energy of 4 microjoules in a circuit with an open switch. The initial equation used is ΔW = 1/2 ΔU² C = 4uJ, leading to two potential voltage values. Participants explore circuit simplifications, including the transformation of a triangle into a star configuration and the application of superposition principles. There are questions about deriving specific current values and the reasoning behind certain equations, particularly regarding Thevenin resistance and the sign conventions used. The conversation highlights the complexity of the calculations and the need for clarity in circuit diagrams for accurate analysis.
diredragon
Messages
321
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


This is the second problem from our test preparation cycle and i partially solved and understood it.
IMG_2330.JPG

The circuit in the picture is in the state of switch being open (STATE 1: SWITCH OPEN). Calculate ##E1## so that the change in the electrical energy of the capacitor is ##ΔW=4uJ##.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
##ΔW=1/2ΔU^2_{1/2}C=4uJ##
##ΔU^2_{1/2}=\pm 2V## [there are two values and we can't determine which is correct so we work both]
##ΔU=ΔU_{ab}## [that voltage is the same for points A and B]
IMG_2331.JPG

Starting to simplify the circuit and added current generator to represent the change in that branch of the circuit:
##Δ=R1+R2+R3## [starting to transfer a triangle into a star]
##RA=\frac{R1R2}{Δ}##;##RB=\frac{R1R3}{Δ}##;##RC=\frac{R2R3}{Δ}## [finished with that]
##ΔU_{ab}=a*ΔIGK## [figured its a superposition principle where we find Uab if only IGK works]
##ΔIGK=\pm 2/55 mA## [immediate jump to the result, didnt quite get that, how did they get that? I am going to try to derive it myself] [dont get #1]
TRY:
##I_{branch}=ΔIGK*\frac{RB+R5}{RA+RB+R4+R5}## [tried the current divider to get the current in left part]
##U_{ab}=I_{branch}*(R4+RA)+ΔIGK*RC## [didnt check the results but i will, does this seem good though?]
Continuation of the solution:
IMG_2332.JPG

##ET=E\mp IR=\mp 2V## [so the theorem of compensation, putting the voltage source instead of the whole branch]
##I=ΔIGK## [the change that happens is that the current flows through the branch]
IMG_2333.JPG

##ET'=E1/8## [now this all of a sudden, how did they get to this?] [dont get #2]
##RT'=55## [the equivalent thevenin resistance i get this but the upper part i can't get still]
##ET'-ET+RT'I=0## [why +RT'I and not -RT'I?] [dont get #3]
##ET'=0 \Rightarrow E1=0##
##ET'0=4 \Rightarrow E1=32##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not happy with your star resistance diagram in the second image.
If I label the left side of R2 as X and the right side of R3 as Y, for your equations to be right, RA connects to point A, RB connects to point Y, and RC connects to point X. The way you have drawn it suggests RA and RC swapped around.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
5K
Back
Top