What Wavelength Maximizes u(lambda) for a 50,000 K Star?

platonic
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At what wavelength is u(lambda) a maximum for a star with a surface temperature of 50,000 K?


Homework Equations


Planck's law
u(lambda)=8(pi)hc/(lambda^5*(e^(hc/kTlambda)-1)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think the maximum is where the derivative of the function u(lambda)=0, but the derivative is too messy to solve in terms of lambda so I can't find the wavelength. So I think I'm way off as far as how to solve it. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, the differentiation should be done in order to get \lambda at maximum energy density. The differentiation isn't too hard, try using the product rule first.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top