What's the best self-study book for statistical mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
For preparing for a graduate-level course in statistical mechanics, Mandl's "Statistical Physics" is highly recommended. The book is praised for its clarity and depth, making it suitable for those who struggled with the undergraduate material. Many participants express confidence that studying Mandl will provide a solid foundation for advanced topics. Engaging with this text can help alleviate anxiety about the upcoming course. Overall, Mandl's book is considered an excellent resource for self-study in statistical mechanics.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I have to take that next year and am nervous about it. I took it as an undergraduate, but most of it went right over my head. Now I have to take the graduate-level course. Can anyone recommend a good book for me to read in preparation for that class?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mandl's book is superb - Statistical Physics

Then you should be fine doing an more advanced class.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Quantum Finding the Perfect Self-Study Book for Intro Stats & Quantum Mechanics
Replies
17
Views
3K
Koopman–von Neumann mechanics references
Replies
5
Views
2K
Other Which Springer books to buy? (QM, GR and statistical mechanics)
Replies
5
Views
2K
How much statistical mechanics is enough for a physicist?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions
Replies
1
Views
3K
Statistical Mechanics - Books suggestions
Replies
2
Views
3K
Intro Physics Opinions on books for (self) studies in statistical physics
Replies
21
Views
5K
Suggestion of a topic for a Statistical Mechanics project
Replies
2
Views
3K
Classical Companion book to Huang's Statistical Mechanics
Replies
12
Views
4K
Classical A relearning experience - self study edition
Replies
16
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top