Whats the equation for rotational momentum?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum can be calculated using two equations: L=Iw for rotation about an object's own axis and L=rxP for rotation relative to another object's axis. The total angular momentum is the sum of the spin and orbital components, which depend on the chosen origin point. If the moment of inertia (I) is defined about the object's center of mass, the linear motion contribution must be added, or the parallel axis theorem can be used to simplify calculations. The distance (r) in the orbital angular momentum equation is measured from the fixed origin to the current position of the object. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately calculating angular momentum in different scenarios.
toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm confused with when to use L=Iw (inertia times angular speed) for momentum and when to use L=rxP (r cross p) for inertia. Can someone please explain to me what each one is?

Homework Equations


Just a conceptual question.

The Attempt at a Solution


Just a conceptual question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is always calculated relative to a point, called the origin. The angular momentum is different depending on what point you choose to consider the origin. So let's take the example of the Earth. The Earth spins on its own axis. That produces an angular momentum relative to the center of the Earth of

\vec{L}_{spin} = I \vec{\omega}

But the Earth also is orbiting around the sun. So if we are computing the origin to be the sun, there is an additional term, the orbital angular momentum, given by:

\vec{L}_{orbital} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}

The total angular momentum about the sun is the sum of these two terms:

\vec{L}_{total} = \vec{L}_{spin} + \vec{L}_{orbital}

By picking the center to be the center of mass of the object, you can make the orbital angular momentum zero.
 
stevendaryl said:
Angular momentum is always calculated relative to a point, called the origin. The angular momentum is different depending on what point you choose to consider the origin. So let's take the example of the Earth. The Earth spins on its own axis. That produces an angular momentum relative to the center of the Earth of

\vec{L}_{spin} = I \vec{\omega}

But the Earth also is orbiting around the sun. So if we are computing the origin to be the sun, there is an additional term, the orbital angular momentum, given by:

\vec{L}_{orbital} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}

The total angular momentum about the sun is the sum of these two terms:

\vec{L}_{total} = \vec{L}_{spin} + \vec{L}_{orbital}

By picking the center to be the center of mass of the object, you can make the orbital angular momentum zero.
oh ok, so basically you use L=Iw if an object is rotating on resect to its own axis and use L=rxp if an object is rotating respect to another objects axis (and if an object does both,,,, rotate on its own axis as well as another object) then you add the two correct?
 
toesockshoe said:
oh ok, so basically you use L=Iw if an object is rotating on resect to its own axis and use L=rxp if an object is rotating respect to another objects axis (and if an object does both,,,, rotate on its own axis as well as another object) then you add the two correct?
Sort of. It depends what you mean by I here. If you are defining I as the MoI about the object's mass centre then yes, you need to add the contribution from the linear motion. Alternatively, you can use the parallel axis theorem to find the MoI about the reference axis, then you don't need to add in the linear contribution. The two methods are equivalent.
 
haruspex said:
Sort of. It depends what you mean by I here. If you are defining I as the MoI about the object's mass centre then yes, you need to add the contribution from the linear motion. Alternatively, you can use the parallel axis theorem to find the MoI about the reference axis, then you don't need to add in the linear contribution. The two methods are equivalent.
hey haruspex, you also replied to my other problem where I asked someone to check my solution to a rotations problem. So in that case, for the r component of the orbital angular momentum be the distance from the point to the center of the stick or would it be from the point to the fixed origin (which was where the center of the stick INITIALLY was)... it would be to where the fixed origin (where the center of the stick INITIALLY was) right?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
411
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top