What's the Half-Life for a Sample with Both Gamma and Beta Decay?

ksac
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sample of radioactive nuclei of a certain element
can decay only by gamma -emission and beta -emission. If
the half-life for gamma -emission is 24 minutes and that
for beta -emission is 36 minutes, what's the half-life for the sample?


2. The attempt at a solution

I don't really know how to go about it.

First i thought that may be the half life of the sample should be the half life of beta decay as gamma radiation does not transform the sample into a new element, but only into it's nuclear isomer; but the answer isn't 36 minutes. So clearly it means a new nuclear species by all means.

Then I calculated the decay constant, lambda, for both, took the average and converted the constant to half life.
that still doesn't match the answer given.

How do i do this? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh i just realized I shouldn't be averaging the decay constants.
Decay constant = Number of decays per unit time.
So the sum of the two decay constants would give me the total decays in unit time (Gamma or bets).
0.693 times the inverse of that would be my half life.

Forgive me for being too quick to share my confusion. :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top