What's Wrong with My Eigenvector Calculation?

athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=54215&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know what's wrong with my work. I can't obtain the eigenvector provided in the model answer.

My work
attachment.php?attachmentid=54214&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg


Model Answer
attachment.php?attachmentid=54216&stc=1&d=1356365308.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IQM.jpg
    IQM.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 582
  • IQM1.jpg
    IQM1.jpg
    26.1 KB · Views: 1,063
  • IQM2.jpg
    IQM2.jpg
    14.4 KB · Views: 601
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work is fine. Remember that an eigenvector is only unique up to a multiplicative constant. The eigenvector you found can be written
$$\left\lvert \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}} \right\rangle = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{1-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{bmatrix} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix}\frac{1-i}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix}e^{-i\pi/4} \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}.$$ If you multiply that by ##e^{i\pi/8}## and ignore the normalization factor of ##1/\sqrt{2}##, you'll get the answer in the solution.
 
Oh! Thank you very much.
But why do we bother to have such a complicated eigenvector?
The one with (1-i)/2 and 1/(sqrt2) is much easier to find. Why do we need to change it to the form of exp?
 
You don't need to, but you have to admit there's certain symmetry there. And physicists like symmetry. :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top