When Do Atoms in an Ideal Gas Exhibit Quantum Mechanical Behavior?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


For what temperatures are the atoms in an ideal gas at pressure P quantum mechanical ? Hint: use the ideal gas law P V = N kT to deduce the interatomic spacing (the answer is T < (1/k)(h 2/3m) 3/5P 2/5). Obviously we want m to be as small as possible and P as large as possible for the gas to show quantum behavior. Put in numbers for helium at atmospheric pressure. Is hydrogen in outer space (interatomic distance ≈ 1 cm and temperature ≈ 3K) quantum mechanical ?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



According to the answer key, to find the interatomic spacing, we need to find the size of a single gas particle. One gas particle corresponds to N=1, and the volume is V = d^3. This leads to

d = \left( \frac{kT}{P} \right)^{1/3}.

I have two objections to this, for which I hope you provide correction. Firstly, assigning the volume V = d^3 implies that we are assuming that the atoms are square? Secondly, how does finding the size of a single gas particle provide us with the interatomic spacing. It would seem that the most we could deduce from such information is, that closest two gas particles could get. Are we to assume that the gas particles are this closely packed? Wouldn't the gas solidify at this point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No bites?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top