gikiian
- 98
- 0
And what is the justification to consider or not to consider dy=dx?
-An Engineer, Weak in Calculus
-An Engineer, Weak in Calculus
It's not assumed because (in general) there is no justification in assuming it. Pretty much as mfb said.gikiian said:And what is the justification to consider or not to consider dy=dx?
I don't think that addresses the OP's question, since they were asking about a differential area element rather than the slope of a curve.UVW said:mfb is correct. Let's consider the equation y = sin(x). Then dy/dx = cos(x). If we use the chain rule (or pretend that dy/dx is a fraction for a moment), we find that dy = cos(x)*dx.
UVW said:mfb is correct. Let's consider the equation y = sin(x). Then dy/dx = cos(x). If we use the chain rule (or pretend that dy/dx is a fraction for a moment), we find that dy = cos(x)*dx.
So dy and dx are going to change their relationship depending on the curve (or plane, etc.) that we're considering, and also on where we are on the curve.
Redbelly98 said:Moderator's note: thread moved from Classical Physics to Calculus
It's not assumed because (in general) there is no justification in assuming it. Pretty much as mfb said.
I don't think that addresses the OP's question, since they were asking about a differential area element rather than the slope of a curve.
dy can be greater than dx, dx can be greater than dy, or they could be equal. The are independent..gikiian said:If we take a differential area inside an ellipse with major axis along y, then will dy be greater than dx?
HallsofIvy said:dy can be greater than dx, dx can be greater than dy, or they could be equal. The are independent..