When Will You Hear a Stone Dropped in a 240m Deep Mine Shaft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter linhy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shaft
AI Thread Summary
To determine when a stone dropped in a 240m deep mine shaft will be heard hitting the bottom, the speed of sound at 23.5°C is calculated to be 345.1 m/s. The time for the stone to fall is calculated using the formula D = (1/2)gt², resulting in approximately 6.93 seconds. The time for the sound to travel back up the shaft is calculated using T = D/V, yielding about 0.695 seconds. Adding both times together gives a total of approximately 7.623 seconds. This combined time is deemed reasonable for the scenario presented.
linhy
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


one last problem..
IF you dropped a stone into a mine shaft that is 240 m deep. HOw soon after you drop the stone do you hear it hit the bottom of the shaft? Assume that temperature for this situation is 23.5 celcius



Homework Equations



So.. in order to get the wave speed i plug in
V= 331 m/s +(.6(23.5 C))
V= 345.1 m/s

I know that T is equal to the inverse of the frequency.. however i don't know how to get the frequency. Does anyone have a clue?


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need the frequency for this. You know the speed of sound, and the distance it travels. From that, you can work out the time it took for the sound to get back up the shaft.

You must also consider the time it took the stone to drop to the bottom of the shaft. That is important in your answer.
 
so i have D= (1/2)gt^2... i solved for t and i got 6.93 second it took for the stone to get up. Then I used V = D/T .. so T = D/V.. hence.. afterward i got .695.. so i add the two answers i got together ...and got 7.623s. Does this answer sound resonable?
 
It looks OK to me.
 
well.. it looks reasonable to me too? thx! ^_^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top