Where Can I Find a Good Reference Book on Group Theory in Physics?

salparadise
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm reposting this in the current section as I'm looking not only for help with homework assignment, but because I'm also looking for good reference textbook.

I'm taking a course on group theory in physics, but the teacher is really bad at making the bridge between the maths and the physics.

As homework I have to do the exercise below. I think I know how to do it but I'm also posting it to see if someone could please recommend a good reference book where this kind of questions are treated. A reference that clearly explains Young diagrams (not just Young tableau) is also something I can't find. I've consulted the following books: Georgi.H and Cornwell.

Homework Statement


Symmetry group S3. Taking into account the direct product of the 2D irreps as follows:
\psi_{i}\otimes\psi^{}_{j} = \Psi_{1}+\Psi_{1}+\Psi_{2}
where:
\Psi_{1} = \psi_1\psi^{'}_1 + \psi_2\psi^{'}_2\\

\Psi_{1'} = \psi_1\psi^{'}_2 - \psi_2\psi^{'}_1\\

\Psi_{2} = (\psi_1\psi^{'}_2 + \psi_2\psi^{'}_1 , \psi_1\psi^{'}_1 - \psi_2\psi^{'}_2 )^T\\

Write the most general scalar potential up to power four, made exclusivly with
two S3 doublets, namely \psi and \chi.

The Attempt at a Solution


Knowing that the product of the 2D irreps of S3 is 2⊗2=1+1'+2, and knowing that a scalar invariant potential can only be formed by spaces of trivial representation. We only need to form all possible products of \psi and \chi up to power 4 and at the end only take the resulting 1 irrep (trivial one) terms.

Thanks in advance

PS - If this should be in another forum section, please let me know.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
looks like that derivative of product der of sum stuff -rewrite it in english
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top