Where Did the Energy Come From? A Physics Puzzle on Entropy and Magnetism

  • Thread starter Thread starter luthier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of magnets spontaneously organizing into a structured block when placed in a bag, raising the question of where the energy comes from to decrease entropy. It highlights the principle that reducing entropy typically requires energy input. One participant explains that the magnetic field itself stores energy, and when magnets come together, the net magnetic field's energy decreases. This energy change occurs due to the work done on or by the magnets as they are moved closer together. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted acknowledgment of the complexity of the topic.
luthier
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
First off, I may or may not know the correct answer to this one...
Here it is..

I have a set of say 100 small perminent magnets which are randomly oriented
in space. I also have an empty burlap sack. I grab each of the magnets one at
a time and throw each one into the bag until all 100 are in the bag.
I then look inside the bag to find that all 100 magnets have attached themselves
to one another to form a single well ordered block of 100.

Remember that there is a law which states that in order to lower entropy you
must add energy in order to "pay" for the decrease in entropy.
The magnets went from a maximum entropy state to one of nearly the most ordered
orientation. Where did the energy come from to lower the entropy ?

Tim
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic field stores energy. When two bar magnets come together (or any set of magnetic dipoles) the resulting net magnetic field is weaker in the amount of energy stored than the fields produced when the two magnets are apart. The energy injected or extracted from the fields is the work done on or by the magnets when they are physically moved in the vicinity of each other.
 
Ok, I guess I will have to come up with a better one ! :-)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top