Where Do Parallel Light Rays Focus When Entering a Glass Hemisphere?

AI Thread Summary
Parallel light rays entering a glass hemisphere with a radius R and an index of refraction greater than air focus at a point relative to point P. The discussion revolves around determining whether the distance of the source, s, can be considered as infinity for calculations, affecting the focal point. If s is assumed to be infinity, the focal point is calculated as f = -R/(1-n1), while assuming s = R yields f = -R. The participants express confusion about the assumptions needed for the calculations and the implications of the index of refraction change. Clarification is sought on the positioning of point P and the nature of the light source in relation to the hemisphere.
lmnt
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Paralel light rays travel from air to a glass hemisphere with radius R and
index of refraction n_{g}that is greater than n_{air}. A top view is shown in the attached image.
(a) Where do the rays focus relative to the point P?
(b) The index of refraction of the hemisphere is increased by 0.5 percent. Does the
focus point change from that in part (a)? If so, then by how much?

Radius=-R (negative since its concave from the picture)
n_{air}=1.00

Homework Equations



\frac{n1}{s} + \frac{n2}{s'} = \frac{n2-n1}{R} where solving for s' would give the point of focus,f (ie. s'=f)
I don't think i can use any of the thin lens eqn's since, well, its not a thin lens right?

The Attempt at a Solution


Here, I'm very confused about what we can assume. Is the distance of the source, s, approximately infinity? or would the source be the distance from p to the flat surface, the radius, R? I'm not really sure either how the rays would interact with the curved surface once it goes through.
If i assume that s=\infty, then i get with the above equation to be f=\frac{-R}{1-n1} But how do i justify that assumption?
Also, if I assume s=R, then i get f=-R.
I'm really sure if either of these are correct, and if one is...why exactly is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the object is at infinity (s=infinity), the image would be at the focal point, so f=-R/(1-n1). If you bring the object closer, the point where the light rays focus would increase, becoming -R at s=R. To calculate the answer for a), you need to know where point P is.
 
oohhkay thanks for clarifying, and i attached a picture, but i don't really noe where that went...anways, it showed a hemisphere with rays coming at it from the right...like p·( <---
and point · p would be at the centre of the curve. So then, from what you're saying, the focus point would be R away? And another question, if it doesn't indicate a source, it just says parallel light rays are coming towards the glass, then do i consider the source as infinity?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top