Where Electric Field Strength + Potential are Zero?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding locations where electric field strength and potential are zero for various charge arrangements. Participants are encouraged to use equations for electric field strength and potential, specifically e = k|q|/r² and V = kq/r, while considering the superposition principle for multiple charges. One user attempts to identify the zero field point in arrangement B, suggesting it is at (4.5, 6), but struggles with proving this mathematically. The importance of understanding how to combine the effects of multiple charges is emphasized, as Maxwell's equations allow for linear superposition of electric fields. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges students face in applying theoretical concepts to practical problems in electrostatics.
karine
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


draw equipotential lines and electric field lines for the following arrangements of charges:
a) +4 at (3,5)
b) +4 at (3,5) and +4 at (6,5)
c) +4 at (3,5) and -4 at (6,5)
d) +5 at (3,5) and -2 at (6,5)
e) +4 at (3,4), (7,4), and (7,7)
f) +4 at (3,4) and (7,4) and -4 at (3,7) and (7,7)
h) +4 at (3,4),(7,4), and (5,8)

#1: find the places in the arrangements from a-f where electric field strength is zero. show your work. State the x,y coordinate where the electric field strength is zero
#2: find the places in each arrangement where the electric potential is zero. show your work.

Homework Equations


e = \frac{k|q|}{r^{2}}
V = \frac{kq}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, my teacher directed me to this applet thing to see what the equipotential and electric field lines would look like, which is this:
http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~phys1/java/phys1/EField/EField.html
so I tried to plot the points and I saved each one as a picture. With this: "draw equipotential lines and electric field lines", show I use the pictures or draw them completely new on separate graph paper?
for #1 for arrangement B, I figured because of the distance the place would be in the middle of the two charges, so at (4.5,6), but I have no idea how I could prove this with any of the equations I've learned. If I use e = k |q| / r^2, and sub in e for 0 and try to find r, I get 189 736.66 :S
I also don't understand how using e = k |q| / r^2 incorporates the fact that there are two charges.
I realize that's not a lot of work done on my own, but I really don't understand what I'm supposed to be doing at all.
This is at a grade 12 level.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing you're missing is that the maxwell equations are linear and can be super-positioned. That is, if you know the field distribution for one charge, and then you place another charge somewhere, you just add the two fields together. That's why we can integrate charges spread out on a circle for example. So the equations you have describe the field around one charge, where r is the distance from that specific charge. So if you want to know the total field, just add them together (but remember to keep track of which r belongs to which charge).

/M
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top