Which Anatomy and Physiology Textbooks Are Best for Premed Students?

  • Thread starter Thread starter google
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fundamental Text
AI Thread Summary
Gray's Anatomy is highly recommended for its coherent organization and comprehensive coverage of systemic anatomy, making it a valuable resource for premed students. Last's Anatomy, while useful for FRCS tests, has faced criticism for past errors and lacks clear diagrams, making it less suitable for personal collections. Guyton & Hall's Medical Physiology is considered outdated and verbose, with organizational issues that hinder exam preparation, although it remains a classic reference. Lange's texts are praised for their organization and succinctness, particularly in physiology, while Lange's Histology is deemed the least favorable option. Overall, students are encouraged to select textbooks that balance thoroughness with clarity to enhance their understanding of anatomy and physiology.
google
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Over this semester I studied quite a few physiology and anatomy books ranging from the classics of Gray's anatomy, Last's anat, Guyton & Hall's medical physiology and also Lange's histology and Lange's physiology. A word of advice to any premed student buying or reading from these books.

Gray's anatomy is by far the most coherently organized systemic anatomy book which covers most dimensions of the human body starting from the molecular basis of each individual system and making its elucidation culminate to the gross perspectives of the respective system. I am referring to the Gray's anatomical basis and principles of surgery which I find is one of the best books to read when studying any science associated with the human body as it covers a wide area of study and is painstakingly updated. To be honest I think it has been a lasting authority over the field of allied health.

Last's anatomy is usually a textbook used in composing FRCS tests so I am pretty sure its going to be very handy. Over the history of its publications it has has severe mistakes like completely missing out the clitoris in the female reproductive system in earlier editions. The significance of which to female reproduction, I am sure is great :blushing:
The book is well organized, the diagrams lack clear labelling and it does cost a lot of money. It is good to borrow it from the library and make study notes from it, however unless you are an educater I doubt it will suite your collection.

Guyton and Hall are severely outdated, a new version is to come this year. It is very hard to read from when preparing for exams and for a subject that deals with such a physical and material concept (namely the human body and its functionality) it doesn't seem to summarise by using graphics and tables. Rather key information is drowned with a surrounding sea of text which although highly explanatory does not suite exam preperation. This book suffers when discussing the special senses, it also is not well organized in mentioning the physiology of the nervous sytem. If you forgive it for these key problems than it becomes a really good book. It is indeed a classic and many have gained knowledge from this book however most books of this genre are well written so it does not excuse it for lacking the organization that it does.

Lange's is very well organized and is good for preperatory work. Guyton's is excellant for a contextual outline for physiological mechanisms and key aspects of human physiology however Lange is well organized, succinct and keys gives the same information in less words.

I hate verbose books, apart from the ones where I require or desire a lot of information. However when a physiology book dedicates itself in mentioning refraction through lenses and does not mention the physiology of rods and cones (referring to the eye) than I feel that, that particular book has severe lackings (I am referring to Guyton).

Lange's histology is by far the worst book one can purchase. The end.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recently I have been self-studying molecular and cellular biophysics. As a result of this self studying I have found that none of the texts that I have come acrossed or used have any exercises to tie into the texts. Now I understand that biophysics isn't normally a topic taught in many universities, at least not as a typical course; however, I find that after completing my daily reading within the texts, that I don't feel like I have gained a tremendious amount of understanding.

More or less, I need some semi-sterile and previously answered questions to play with to ensure that I am understanding what I am readinhttps://www.physicsforums.com/images/smilies/love.gifg.

With that being said If anyone knows of a biophysics text, or a text that concerns topics within biophysics and has questions/examples within it to tinker around with it, I would be deeply grateful.

To aid in narrowing down on books that would be of use I am including the list of texts I am reading at the moment:


Biophysics- Glaser

Mathematical Biophysics; Physico-Mathematical Foundations of Biology- Rashevesky Vol. 1

Molecular and Cellular Biophysics- Jackson (Which has questions; however, they are few in number).

Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi, a friend of mine is studying computer sciences, but recently she stated that she made a mistake and that she really wanted to study biology (note: we live in country where changing subject is not easy) so i decided to give her a book about usage of computer sciences in biology. She has advanced knowledge of computer sciences (she is taking a Master course at the moment) but her knowledge of biology is poor.
In brief, can you suggest me any book about bioinformatics/computational methods in biology that is great for computer scientist?
 
I'm an undergraduate doing research on molecular BEC's and although Griffiths-level quantum mechanics is enough to do my part, I'm trying to understand as much of the work I'm building on as possible, and some of it is quite advanced. The main thing I'm looking for is a text that describes the behavior of molecules.

Specifically, I'm looking for the sort of book that would discuss molecular wavefunctions, such as rigid rotor models, including things like dipole moments and the Stark effect. Preferably something at the "beginning graduate/advanced undergraduate level" (if that even exists).
 
Last edited:
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
163
Views
26K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
78
Views
8K
Back
Top