Which arrangement of voltmeter is better for measuring p.d. across a capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samuelwsc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voltmeter
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two arrangements for measuring the potential difference (p.d.) across a capacitor using a voltmeter and ammeter. Arrangement 1 places the voltmeter in parallel with the capacitor, while Arrangement 2 positions it in series with the ammeter. If the ammeter has resistance, Arrangement 2 is favored for more accurate readings since it avoids measuring the p.d. across the ammeter. However, some experiments have successfully used Arrangement 1, suggesting it may have specific advantages in certain contexts. The debate highlights the importance of considering the ammeter's resistance when choosing the measurement setup.
samuelwsc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.  ----┤├----(ammeter)-------
    |  cap                |
    |                  |
    └------(voltmeter)-----┘

     
2.  ----┤├----(ammeter)-------
    | cap     |
    |       |
    └ (voltmeter)┘

Two different arrangement of voltmeter are used to measure the p.d. across the cap. What are the pros & cons of using arrangement 1 ?
can anyone help me with this question? :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If the ampere meter is ideal (that is, it has no resistance), then there is no difference. So let's assume the ampere meter does have some resistance, which of the arrangements would give a more accurate reading for de potential difference over the capacitator?
 
i think arrangement 2 would give a more accurate reading as it doen't involve
the p.d. across the ammeter . But then what is the advantage of using 1 :confused: i saw some experiments using it...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top