Which book should I buy for Tensor Analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting appropriate textbooks for studying tensor analysis in the context of general relativity. The user has read Schutz's 'A First Course in General Relativity' and 'Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics' but seeks additional resources due to a lack of examples in these texts. Recommendations include Heinbockel's 'Introduction to Tensor Calculus and Continuum Mechanics' for its clarity and examples, and Wald's 'General Relativity' for its rigorous treatment of tangent spaces and abstract index notation. The user is advised to consider both Wald and Schutz simultaneously to reinforce understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with general relativity concepts from Schutz's 'A First Course in General Relativity'
  • Basic understanding of tensor calculus and its applications
  • Knowledge of vector spaces and manifolds
  • Awareness of index notation and abstract index notation in tensor analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Heinbockel's 'Introduction to Tensor Calculus and Continuum Mechanics' for foundational examples
  • Study Wald's 'General Relativity' to understand tangent spaces and abstract index notation
  • Explore Goldber's 'Tensor Analysis on Manifolds' for additional examples and clarity
  • Investigate index-free notation resources to enhance comprehension of tensor operations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and tensor analysis, as well as educators seeking comprehensive resources for teaching these concepts.

Mmmm
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I'm just starting out with learning a bit of general relativity and have read the first 3 chapters of Schutz's 'A first course in General Relativity' (up to and including the Tensor analysis chapter). I have managed to do about 90% of the exercises but I don't really feel confident with it. I've decided that I need to do some studying of tensor analysis so that I can feel at ease with this subject but I'm not sure which book to buy.

I have also read the first couple of chapters of Schutz's 'Geometrical methods of mathematical physics' in order to get some more insight into this, but I think that the problem is that Schutz never gives any examples and so when I tackle a problem I'm never sure if I did it in a 'good' way or not.

I have a copy of Heinbockel's 'Introduction to tensor calculus and continuum mechanics' which I have heard is nice and slow and gives lots of examples, but this book uses the old index notation and I'm not sure if it is worth my while reading this or not. Will one method help understanding with the other or should I avoid the index notation altogether?

I have seen mentioned in this forum Goldber's 'Tensor Analysis on Manifolds'. does this have lots of examples? and the Schaum book I know has lots of examples but is this another index notation book?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a copy of Wald's book too? I felt that the two of them were sufficient to get me to understand tensor fields. Schutz explains tensors extremely well in my opinion (in the SR part of the book) but he's just talking about some arbitrary vector space and some basis of that vector space, so it's not easy to see how this relates to manifolds. Wald defines the tangent space and explains how a coordinate system can be used to construct a basis for the tangent space. (Schutz didn't explain this well if I remember correctly). Now you can apply everything you've learned from Schutz, with the vector space being T_pM (the tangent space of M at p) and the basis vectors being the derivative operators \partial/\partial x^\mu|_p. After that it's pretty easy to understand e.g. vector fields as local sections of the tangent bundle.

It might be a good idea to also read (the interesting parts of) some book that uses the index free notation, but unfortunately I don't know what the best recommendation is. Wald uses the abstract index notation, which must be the best one by far when you have to construct new tensors from old ones using the operation of contraction, but is (in my opinion) a little awkward in definitions of e.g. a connection or the curvature tensor.
 
I was lead to believe that Wald's book was a fair bit more difficult than the Schutz and so planned on reading it after I had finished Schutz. Do you suggest dipping into both simultaneously then? I really want to get to grips with this before I continue as it is pretty important stuff.
 
i am self learning physics. have you ever worked your way backwards again after finishing most undergrad courses? i have textbooks for junior/senior physics courses in classical mechanics, electrodynamics, thermal physics, quantum mechanics, and mathematical methods for self learning. i have the Halliday Resnick sophomore book. working backwards, i checked out Conceptual Physics 11th edition by Hewitt and found this book very helpful. What i liked most was how stimulating the pictures...

Similar threads

Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
610
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K