Which Calorimeter Is Better for Minimizing Experimental Interference?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jzq
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calorimetry
AI Thread Summary
When comparing two calorimeters, one with a heat capacity of 10.53 calories/°C and the other with 104.3 calories/°C, the calorimeter with the lower heat capacity is generally preferred. This is because it has less interference with experimental results, allowing for more accurate measurements. However, knowing the heat capacity of either calorimeter enables researchers to adjust their calculations accordingly, ensuring accurate data interpretation regardless of which calorimeter is used.
jzq
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I am comparing two calorimeters. One has a heat capacity of 10.53 calories/degrees celsius and the second one has a heat capacity of 104.3 calories/degrees celsius. I just need to know which one is better and why.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The one with lower heat capacity is considered better because it will interfere less with your experiments. But as long as you know the heat capacity you can go back and make the proper calculation for the data that you're interested in.
 
noobie said:
The one with lower heat capacity is considered better because it will interfere less with your experiments. But as long as you know the heat capacity you can go back and make the proper calculation for the data that you're interested in.
Thanks a lot noobie!
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top