Which design is better for a popsicle stick bridge: left or right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agm1984
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between two designs for a popsicle stick bridge, focusing on their ability to handle a centrally loaded weight. The left design features trusses that mitigate torsion forces effectively but raises concerns about how downward forces will be distributed. The right design, a modified Warren truss, is more traditional and may require additional materials to manage side-to-side forces. Participants emphasize the importance of load application, noting that the vertical members in the right design could provide better stability than the angled members in the left design. Ultimately, the choice hinges on balancing innovative design with structural integrity under load.
agm1984
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i am building a popsicle stick bridge, and i basically have two trusses, which i am attaching together to make the bridge (each are one side of the bridge), and I am having trouble deciding which way to orient the two trusses.

if you look at the picture below, you can see that there are 2 proposed bridges in the picture, and all four trusses are built identically, so the only question is which design to go with?

the bridge will be tested by center loaded weight hanging off the bottom middle of the bridge.

which of these 2 designs would handle that weight better?


Homework Equations



not much, maybe method of joints analysis but i would prefer to work theoretically based off the image alone.

The Attempt at a Solution



bridge on the left:
it looks like it will mitigate torsion forces awesomely because the bridge itself turns into a maximally rigid gemetric shape. my biggest worry is how this will actually spread the forces compared to the bridge on the right which i understand quite well.

i googled triangle truss, and there are many images that show this sort of design so i wonder if its legitimate.

to reiterate, my biggest worry is "how will the downward (negative y direction) force being centrally loaded on the bridge affect this design compared to the bridge on the right? is there a clear winning choice?
if its a matter of preferance i think i will go with the bridge on the left because it looks radical and innovative.

bridge on the right:
standard warren truss with a few mods to aid in mitigating top beam compression forces. would require more popsicle sticks to mitigate torsion/side to side forces during the testing and subsequent crushing of the bridge.



i would prefer if you guys didnt just hint and steer me in the right direction, but rather explicitly state whether the bridge on the left or right would be superior and why.
its just a physics 12 level bridge and we arent actually analyzing the force vectors. its just a creative exercise in trusses and whatnot.

both bridges are going to be 110 popsicle sticks, and if i build the bridge on the right, it should hold around 200 lbs with a span of 50cm.
i have no idea how the bridge on the left would affect my 200 lb approximation. I am hoping it would be similar or better, rather than drastically worse for X,Y,Z reasons.

heres the image, the trusses are pretty much just laying against each other in the proposed positions:
photo1-1_zps6c26342a.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anyone? which bridge looks more legit?
 
Never built one from pop sticks but...

I would think how the load will be applied to the bottom of the bridge. With the design on the right the lower members are vertical (eg the sticks are upright). With the design on the left the sticks lean over at 45 degrees. I suspect you might see these sticks bend sideways?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top