Courses Which instrument would be a better tool for advanced physics courses?

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS and the TI 89 TITANIUM for a linear algebra course, both calculators are recommended by professors, but opinions vary on their necessity. Some users suggest opting for a less expensive, high-end non-graphing calculator, like the Sharp EL-516 or Casio fx-991ES, which can handle most non-symbolic tasks effectively for under $20. They argue that for complex calculations or visualizations, computer software is often preferred over handheld devices. The CAS CX is noted for its ease of use and utility in checking calculations, particularly for physics students, while the TI 89 TITANIUM may not offer significant advantages for upper-level courses. Ultimately, the choice should consider future needs in engineering physics, with many advocating for a balance between cost and functionality.
cesaruelas
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
This question may be in the wrong section and quite irrelevant for many of you. Anyway, I need to buy a new calculator for my linear algebra course to deal with matrices and that stuff... which would you recommed I buy between the TI INSPIRE CX - CAS and the TI 89 TITANIUM? These are the ones my professor recommends but IDK which of these will be a better... investment for future courses (engineering physics) (they both cost the same in my country, around 200 us dollars) since I wouldn't want to buy one only for this course and then have to buy another one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my experience, get the cheapest one possible. Anything that requires computation in upper level courses does not require an advanced calculator.
 
Jorriss said:
In my experience, get the cheapest one possible. Anything that requires computation in upper level courses does not require an advanced calculator.

On top of this, it has been my experience that if a complex calculation or visualization of results is needed, then a computer package is often preferred in place of a handheld calculator device.
 
Calculators that are capable of symbolic calculation (integration, etc.) carry a hefty price premium. These days it doesn't make any sense to pay that premium unless you need to have those functions in a small portable package.

Really, just buy a high-end non-graphing calculator like the Sharp EL-516 or Casio fx-991ES for under $20.
http://edu.casio.com/products/ntd/fx991es/
http://www.sharpusa.com/forhome/homeoffice/calculators/elw516b.aspx

Both can do just about any non-symbolic task a calculator needs to do.

Anything they can't do, use wxMaxima (it is free).
http://maxima.sourceforge.net/download.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxima_(software )
This will be sufficient to check your Linear Algebra homework.

Later, if you are doing serious numerical computation, you can use something like Octave (similar to Matlab).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd go with CAS CX. There seems to be a lot of stubborn "pencil and paper or matlab, no in between" on these forums.

I have a CAS CX, and it's main utility is just to check if I'm wrong, or to make a calculation without access to a computer easier. I'm not always in front of mathematica or matlab, so I need to use a calculator to check if an integral is correct. And the utility and simplicity of the input of the CAS CX is unrivaled.

I sold my 89 Titanium and bought the CAS CX when it came out... best purchase I've made as a physics student.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top