Which is stronger? eletrical or magnetic fields?

davidong3000
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
A single stationary electron's magnetic flux caused by it's spin gives it a north and south pole right? does that mean it's north pole would be attracted to the south pole of a hypothetical nearby stationary electron?

how would this attractive force compare to it's electric force of repulsion at equal distances? what's the ratio?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davidong3000 said:
A single stationary electron's magnetic flux caused by it's spin gives it a north and south pole right? does that mean it's north pole would be attracted to the south pole of a hypothetical nearby stationary electron?
how would this attractive force compare to it's electric force of repulsion at equal distances? what's the ratio?

It's a strange way of stating it the way you do, but yes, there is a "magnetic dipole interaction" between electrons. It's pretty weak, but spectroscopically visible. However, the main effect doesn't come from the magnetic dipole interaction between different electrons, but rather between the intrinsic magnetic moment of the electron related to its spin (the thing you talk about), and the more conventional magnetic moment of the same electron, because it is in orbit (a circulating charge also generates a magnetic field). This effect is called "spin-orbit coupling" and is part of the fine structure of the spectra of atoms.
 
vanesch said:
It's a strange way of stating it the way you do, but yes, there is a "magnetic dipole interaction" between electrons. It's pretty weak, but spectroscopically visible. However, the main effect doesn't come from the magnetic dipole interaction between different electrons, but rather between the intrinsic magnetic moment of the electron related to its spin (the thing you talk about), and the more conventional magnetic moment of the same electron, because it is in orbit (a circulating charge also generates a magnetic field). This effect is called "spin-orbit coupling" and is part of the fine structure of the spectra of atoms.

so precisely how much stronger is an electrical force to a magnetic force between 2 stationary electrons? 1:100?

Remember that they are stationar but still have a magnetic field caused by their spin.
 
Last edited:
davidong3000 said:
so precisely how much stronger is an electrical force to a magnetic force between 2 stationary electrons? 1:100?

Remember that they are stationar but still have a magnetic field caused by their spin.

The electron magnetic moment equals - sqrt(1/2(1+1/2)) e hbar / (m c)

From this you can calculate the magnetic field generated by the magnetic dipole at a certain distance and angle, and the energy another (identical) magnetic dipole has.

You can find the magnetic dipole field here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole

The gradient of this energy wrt the place where the second dipole is, will give you the force experienced due to the dipole-dipole interaction.

You can compare this to the Coulomb interaction.
 
Actually (in solids at least), the "exchange interaction" that causes spins to line up is a result of the exclusion principle coupled with the Coulomb interaction. It's energetically favorable for the electron-electron two-body state to be anti-symmetric in real space, because it reduces the Coulomb interaction, but this causes the spins to be symmetric, and therefore they have to line up. This is what is perceived as the "dipole-dipole interaction" that leads to magnetism, but the pure dipole-dipole interaction is entirely too weak to account for the temperatures that we see the phase transition at.

So that should give you a sense of scale of the interaction: at equal distances, some sort of exclusion effect is far more powerful than the actual dipole-dipole interaction.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top