Which Kind of Chopper Should I Assume for Transistors in Power Electronics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the appropriate type of chopper to assume for transistors in a power electronics exercise. Key points include the necessity of knowing the frequency and duty cycle to compute power loss, which are provided in later parts of the exercise. The energy lost per cycle can be calculated using the integral of voltage over time, requiring multiple regions of integration. Additionally, once the inductor current is constant, the voltage and current across the load can be analyzed. Ultimately, the specific type of chopper is deemed less important than understanding the provided figures and the calculations needed for power loss and efficiency.
jas1991
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'd need some help regarding some parts of an exercise (attached below). The question is that they make me assume that the tranistors is working as a chopper, so then I have many things to calculate. The question is, which kind of chopper should I assume?

Thanks in advance.

http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/331/powerelectronics.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A. You can't compute the power loss without knowing the frequency f or duty cycle d. f isn't mentioned until part B and d in part D.

The ENERGY lost per cycle is just E = ∫Vidt. Use Fig. 1 to compute that integral (there are five regions of integration; add 'em up).

B. P = E/T where T = 1/f

C. Once the inductor current is constant, what is the voltage across the load? The current? Ergo, the resistive load?

D. This also requires several integrations. Power is almost d*Vd*I0 but not quite.

E. (P in load - P lost in switch)/(P in load)

F. Look at fig. 1 and think about the two things you must have to generate switching losses.

Try to go from there ...
 
I didn't answer your question, did I.

But that's because you don't need to know what kind. All you need is fig. 1 (and I guess fig.2, though it's a crummy equivalent ckt IMHO.
 
Back
Top