Which Lifter Bearing is Best for Food Industry Machines

AI Thread Summary
In the food industry, for a machine operating at 30 RPM with a lifter traveling 500mm and undergoing nightly washdowns, bushings are recommended over linear bearings. The minimal lubrication and potential misalignment issues with linear bearings can lead to reduced performance in harsh conditions. Users report that bushings can last up to three times longer in wet environments compared to linear bearings. The consensus is that while linear bearings excel in well-maintained settings, bushings are more reliable for the food industry. Overall, bushings are deemed the better choice for longevity and durability in this application.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
what is best,a machine we use in the food industry, cycles at
30rpm a direct
drive cam opperates a lifter that travels 500mm up and
down, the machine is washed down every night,there is
no particulate matter.
so would linear bearings or bushes be best for lifter?
"lubrication is minimal"
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd go with a bushing. My personal experience with linear bearings is that the races move unless precise allignment is maintained. If there's a lot of side thrust a bushing would have to be replaced more often.
 
thanks for reply GENIERE.
i have come to the same conclusion,linear brgs are excelent
in well maintained environment ,but in harsh wet food industry
bushes seem to last up to three times longer.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top