Which of these relations are functions of x on R

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying which of several trigonometric relations are functions of x over the set of all real numbers (R). The original poster presents a list of functions and expresses confusion regarding the correct answer based on the vertical line test and an answer sheet.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the criteria for a relation to be considered a function, particularly in relation to the vertical line test and the implications of vertical asymptotes for certain trigonometric functions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively clarifying the definitions and conditions under which specific trigonometric functions qualify as functions on the real number line. There is acknowledgment of confusion regarding vertical asymptotes and their impact on function definition.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the domain of the functions being all real numbers, with specific attention to the implications of vertical asymptotes for sine, cosine, and other trigonometric functions.

Erenjaeger
Messages
141
Reaction score
6
Mentor note: moved to homework section

y = sin(x)
y = cos(x)
y = tan(x)
y = csc(x)
y = sec(x)
y = cot(x)

(a) 0 (b) 4 (c) 6 (d) 2
I thought it was (c) because i graphed all the trig functions and they passed the vertical line test but the answer sheet is saying (d) 2
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"on R" is referring to the domain of function being all real numbers. Only sine and cosine satisfy this.
 
pwsnafu said:
"on R" is referring to the domain of function being all real numbers. Only sine and cosine satisfy this.
oh true, that's where i was confused i think then, so is that because the others have vertical asymptotes ?
 
no, it is because they are not defined at the x coordinate of the vertical asymptote. but i think that is what you meant.
 
mathwonk said:
no, it is because they are not defined at the x coordinate of the vertical asymptote. but i think that is what you meant.
yeah that's what i was meaning, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K