Which Online Star Catalogue Provides Distances and Masses of Stars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astronomy Star
dekoi
I need to access a star catalogue on the internet that will tell me the distance of the stars from earth, as well as the mass of the stars.

I need to "find" 2 stars:
approx. 346.7 pc from Earth
approx. 0.4786 pc from Earth

I realize that there may be none. However, the point of the assignment is to find these values for a supernova, and then determine whether there is ACTUALLY a high-mass star that close to Earth that can one day explode as a supernova.

Thank you for any help you can provide-- whether you know the answer, or you know of a catalogue of the type specified.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get distances from almost any decent catalog, e.g. Hipparcos. I don't know of any catalogs which directly include mass, since mass is a relatively challenging quantity that cannot be determined (as of yet) by a highly-automated satellite observatory.

Here's a good list of the most common star catalogs:

http://ad.usno.navy.mil/star/star_cats_rec.shtml

- Warren
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is there an on-line catalogue? I don't think those are on-line.

Thanks.
 
Almost every catalog listed there is available in its entirety online, as they were created with public funds and are considered public information. Most of them even have online search tools, publicly available.

Come on, dekoi. Read the page. Click the links. Use google.

- Warren
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top