Which QFT book is better? Peskin & Shroder or Weinberg?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion compares the merits of Peskin & Schroder and Weinberg's books on quantum field theory. Peskin & Schroder is noted for lacking coverage of canonical quantization of QED, which is essential for certain courses. Weinberg's book offers a unique approach, starting with the principles of quantum mechanics and special relativity before introducing quantum fields and interactions, delaying canonical quantization until later chapters. Alternatives like Mandl & Shaw, Srednicki, and Zee are suggested, with Zee recommended for readers already familiar with traditional quantum field theory. Overall, the choice of text depends on the reader's background and specific needs in the subject.
petergreat
Messages
266
Reaction score
4
The title is my question. What are the relative merits of the two books? I've only read part of Peskin & Schroder, and one of my complaints is that the book doesn't cover canonical quantization of QED which I need for my course. I don't know much about Weinberg's book, but it seems to be have more in-depth discussions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Weinberg's approach is very different. He starts with a discussion of the general principles of QM and SR, and how combining the two leads to the concept of non-interacting particles. Then he starts talking about creation/annihilation operators and how to combine them into quantum fields. Those fields are used to define interactions. When he derives the Feynman rules for an arbitrary QFT with interactions, he still hasn't said anything about canonical quantization. I think that doesn't appear until chapter 7.

If you need a book that's a lot like P&S, you might want to consider Mandl & Shaw. Other popular choices are Srednicki, and Zee. The latter starts with the path integral approach right away.
 
Last edited:
Zee strikes me as a book to read after you've already had the "traditional" introduction to the subject.

I think Srednicki might make a good text if supplemented with, say, the Itzykson & Zuber (inexepensive Dover edition) for background reading.
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Back
Top