Which scatters light more: a sphere or a hemisphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the effectiveness of spheres versus hemispheres as light scatterers for Thin-Film Solar Cells (TFSC). It highlights that hemispherical scatterers may be easier to apply and could potentially scatter light in a flatter cone, making solar cells thinner and cheaper. The participants note that the effectiveness of scattering depends on the positioning of the shapes relative to the incoming light and the materials used. There is an acknowledgment that a definitive answer requires theoretical modeling, as the interaction of light with these shapes can vary significantly. Overall, the hemisphere is suggested to have advantages in certain applications, but further analysis is needed to confirm this.
zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
In case the context, which this question is based needs to be provided, the context follows. A sub-project was being done on using sphere or hemisphere "scatterers" on TFSC (Thin-Film Solar Cells). These "scatterers" can be applied on the top of a TFSC in order so that the solar cells can direct light waves in a flatter "cone" after interaction, hence allowing the solar cells to be made thinner, and hence cheaper.

Now, back to the original question. Which shape might scatters light (regular solar light, centered around ~500 nm) better, according to classical Electrodynamics (and maybe some intuition), a sphere or a hemisphere? (Although, I suppose it might be harder for spherical "scatterers" to be "applied" to a TFSC than a hemispherical "scatterers".)
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Can you show a sketch of the setup?
What is "better"?
 
In simple diagrams, which shape scatters light in a flatter "cone" (if that's the shape):

a) O<---
b) D<---

(O being a sphere, and D being a hemisphere)
 
zheng89120 said:
In case the context, which this question is based needs to be provided, the context follows. A sub-project was being done on using sphere or hemisphere "scatterers" on TFSC (Thin-Film Solar Cells). These "scatterers" can be applied on the top of a TFSC in order so that the solar cells can direct light waves in a flatter "cone" after interaction, hence allowing the solar cells to be made thinner, and hence cheaper.

Now, back to the original question. Which shape might scatters light (regular solar light, centered around ~500 nm) better, according to classical Electrodynamics (and maybe some intuition), a sphere or a hemisphere? (Although, I suppose it might be harder for spherical "scatterers" to be "applied" to a TFSC than a hemispherical "scatterers".)

My first reaction is to suggest that unless the radiation can somehow impinge on the "back half" of a sphere, there should be no difference--if both are positioned normal to the direction of radiation. A diagram would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
By scatter, do you mean "focus"?
 
As a loose guess, I would say the hemisphere since it has less focusing power.

Regardless, I don't think there is a straightforward answer (by straightforward I mean something that can be answered without some theoretical modelling).

Also, the material (dielectric, semiconductor etc.) will likely have a significant effect on the answer.

Claude.
 
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
Thread 'How to model converging illumination through object plane (in ZEMAX)'
Hello community, I'm designing a projection lens system for a 35mm film projector in Zemax OpticStudio and struggling with the correct sequential mode setup for the illumination geometry. The light source is a Xenon short-arc lamp reflected by an ellipsoid mirror, which creates a converging cone with a 40.6 degree full angle that passes through the film gate. The film gate is my object plane, but the light doesn't diverge from it like a typical Lambertian source. Instead, the converging...

Similar threads

2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
2
Replies
96
Views
10K
Back
Top