Which term should be chosen for u(x) in integration by parts?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the indefinite integral of the function ∫(x^2/(2+x^3)) dx. The correct integration by parts formula is confirmed, but participants suggest that integration by parts may not be necessary for this problem. Instead, a substitution of u = x^3 is recommended to simplify the integral to a standard form. Additionally, it's noted that selecting the term whose derivative approaches zero quickly, such as x^2, can aid in the integration process. Ultimately, the consensus is that simpler methods exist for solving this integral without resorting to integration by parts.
zanazzi78
Messages
115
Reaction score
1
ok i`m really struggling with the concept.
I've been asked to find the indefinite integral of;

\int \frac{x^2}{(2+ x^3)} dx

so before i beg for the answer could someone confirm that i`ve got the right rule to solve this;

\int u(x) v'(x) = [ u(x) v(x)] - \int v(x) u'(x)

if this is right would you mind giving a suggestion to what u(x) to use?

p.s. i may have to edit this if latex doesn`t come out right I've been having trouble with it and only jointed the forum a few day's ago!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is the correct formula (it's surely in your textbook), but I don't see any good reason for using integration by parts. That's a fairly standard anti-derivative: look up "arctangent".
 
I`ve just edited it. Now it`s integration by parts! see I`m getting all flustered
 
Actually, you still don't need integration by parts. Substituting u = x^3 will simplify it to a standard form.

Anyways, since differentiation is in some sense the inverse operation to integration, every differentiation rule yields an integration rule. I'm sure you remember the product rule:

\frac{d}{dx}(f(x) g(x)) = f^\prime (x) g(x) + g^\prime (x) f(x)

Rearraging the equation above gives

f(x) g^\prime (x) = \left[f(x) g(x)\right]^\prime - f^\prime(x)g(x)

And integrating both sides with respect to x gives

\int f(x) g^\prime (x) \ dx = \int \left(\frac{d}{dx} (f(x) g(x)) - f^\prime(x)g(x)\right) \ dx

but certainly, \int \frac{d}{dx}(f(x)g(x)) \ dx = f(x)g(x), so this just reduces to

\int f(x)g^\prime (x) \ dx = f(x)g(x) - \int g(x) f^\prime (x) \ dx

which is what your teacher probably called the formula for integration by parts.
 
Last edited:
x^{2}dx=\frac{1}{3}d(2+x^{3}) so the integration is simple...

Daniel.
 
zanazzi78 said:
ok i`m really struggling with the concept.
I've been asked to find the indefinite integral of;

\int \frac{x^2}{(2+ x^3)} dx

so before i beg for the answer could someone confirm that i`ve got the right rule to solve this;

\int u(x) v'(x) = [ u(x) v(x)] - \int v(x) u'(x)

if this is right would you mind giving a suggestion to what u(x) to use?

p.s. i may have to edit this if latex doesn`t come out right I've been having trouble with it and only jointed the forum a few day's ago!
As others have said, you don't have to use integration by parts to solve this, but ...

Pick the term whose derivative will eventually go to zero (the soonest). In this case, it's x^2. First derivative is 2x. Second derivative is 2. Third derivative is 0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top