Who is the Goldstein of Quantum Mechanics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying a key textbook for Quantum Mechanics that parallels the significance of Goldstein's text in Classical Mechanics. While J. J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" and Leslie Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" are highlighted as popular graduate-level texts, it is suggested that Schiff's "Quantum Mechanics" shares characteristics with Goldstein's work, such as being a classic choice with limited competition during its peak. The conversation notes that Goldstein's text is now seen as somewhat dated and is not universally adopted in modern curricula, with some institutions like Princeton moving away from it. The mention of Jackson's text indicates a shared sentiment about the challenges faced by students in classical physics. Anticipation is expressed for Mahan's upcoming quantum mechanics book, which is expected to provide a fresh perspective in the field.
Winzer
Messages
597
Reaction score
0
What Goldstein is to Classical Mechanics, who/m is to Quantum Mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Schiff.
 
Winzer said:
What Goldstein is to Classical Mechanics, who/m is to Quantum Mechanics?

I don't know if there is such a book.

Modern Quantum Mechanics by J. J. Sakurai,

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0201539292/?tag=pfamazon01-20,

is often used as a grad text, but I prefer Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development,
by Leslie Ballentine,

https://www.amazon.com/dp/9810227078/?tag=pfamazon01-20.

See

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=276701.
 
While these are excellent books, arguably better to learn from than Schiff's, they aren't the best answer to the poster's question. Goldstein:
a) was the classic American grad text for generations
b) had virtually no competition in its heyday
c) was eventually joined by numerous other excellent texts
d) now seems dated in many areas of presentation and in breadth of coverage
and now, because of c and d
e) is no longer the first choice for classes nor is necessarily the best to learn from.

I claim that only Schiff's Quantum Mechanics text mirrors all of these traits.

If you want the best book, then that's another thread!
 
Is it really true that modern grad students are no longer tortured with Goldstein? Next you'll tell me they don't have to face the horrors of Jackson, either.
 
Well, maybe it was partly wishful thinking. A quick survey shows that Princeton doesn't use Goldstein, but MIT and Harvard do.

Jackson, on the other hand, is universal (and maybe always will be?)
 
We used Jose and Saletan... If you want torture, these are your guys.

Oh, and to be on topic, I suppose Schiff probably is the answer to the question as stated. I can't wait for Mahan's quantum book to come out, though.
 
  • #10
Thanks guys
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Back
Top