Why a(pt=proportional to) pt b and a pt c implies a pt bc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rishabh Narula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proportional
Rishabh Narula
Messages
61
Reaction score
5
hmm.very thankful to everyone who answered but i think where I am actually getting stuck is nothing high level.im just not getting why a proportional to b and a proportional to c implies a proportional to bc .i get it that if b changes by factor x then a changes by factor x and at the same time if c changes by y then that a.x would change by y resulting a net change a into a.x.y and also i mean yeah when you see a proprtional to bc it is evident that b,c getting changed by x,y makes a change by xy.but i want some more derived proof or something i guess.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##a## proportional to ##b## means ##a=K_1b## and ##a## proportional to ##c## means ##a=K_2c##. Combining the last two equations, you get ##K_1b=K_2c## or ##\frac{K_1}{K_2}=\frac{c}{b}## valid for all ##b## and ##c##. This equation is satisfied by ##K_1=K_3c## and ##K_2=K_3b## with ##K_3## being non-zero. Therefore ##a=K_3bc##.
 
  • Like
Likes Rishabh Narula
blue_leaf77 said:
##a## proportional to ##b## means ##a=K_1b## and ##a## proportional to ##c## means ##a=K_2c##. Combining the last two equations, you get ##K_1b=K_2c## or ##\frac{K_1}{K_2}=\frac{c}{b}## valid for all ##b## and ##c##. This equation is satisfied by ##K_1=K_3c## and ##K_2=K_3b## with ##K_3## being non-zero. Therefore ##a=K_3bc##.
blue_leaf77 said:
##a## proportional to ##b## means ##a=K_1b## and ##a## proportional to ##c## means ##a=K_2c##. Combining the last two equations, you get ##K_1b=K_2c## or ##\frac{K_1}{K_2}=\frac{c}{b}## valid for all ##b## and ##c##. This equation is satisfied by ##K_1=K_3c## and ##K_2=K_3b## with ##K_3## being non-zero. Therefore ##a=K_3bc##.
this helped a lot.thank you for your time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top