Why Are G-Units Preferred Over Direct Force Measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jimgoh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
G-units are preferred over direct force measurements because they provide a relatable ratio of acceleration to gravity, making concepts easier to understand for the public. Using G-units allows for clearer communication, such as describing a fighter pilot experiencing five times their normal weight, rather than using complex force calculations. Force varies based on mass, complicating direct comparisons, while acceleration remains constant across different bodies. The discussion also humorously suggests that using "z" instead of "g" could add a playful twist to the terminology. Overall, G-units simplify the communication of acceleration effects in various contexts.
jimgoh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Why do people use G-units? Essentially it is a ratio of the acceleration with gravity, why not use force directly? Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's only used when talking to the public/media. It's easier to picture eg. a fighter pilot experiencing 5times their normal weight than mass_of_head * 49m/s^2.
 
And you can't use force because its not constant for each body, only the acceleration is. For example I experience a greater force from gravity than my computer, which I am about to drop out the window, does because I have more mass.

I always though it would be cool if they used a z instead of a g because then everyone would sound like they had a german accent.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
102
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top