Why Are Orbital Angular Momentum Quantum Numbers Restricted in H2 Molecule?

whiteboard1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, I cannot solve this problem. Please help me.

In the H2 molecule, the Pauli exclusion principle demands that the wavefunction of two protons
be antisymmetric under the interchange of the two proton coordiates. Based on this, explain the
(a) In the spin-triplet states of two protons (“orthohydrogen”), the orbital angular momentum quantum number associated with the relative motion of two protons is restricted to odd-integer values
only.
(b) In the spin-singlet state of two protons (“parahydrogen”), the orbital angular momentum quantum number is restricted to even-integer values only.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) The Pauli Exclusion Principle states that two protons cannot occupy the same quantum state, so in order to make the wavefunction antisymmetric, the two protons must have different quantum numbers. In the spin-triplet state, the two protons must have different orbital angular momentum quantum numbers. This means that the total angular momentum of the system is odd, so the orbital angular momentum quantum number is restricted to odd-integer values only. (b) In the spin-singlet state, on the other hand, the two protons must have the same orbital angular momentum quantum number in order to make the wavefunction antisymmetric. This means that the total angular momentum of the system is even, so the orbital angular momentum quantum number is restricted to even-integer values only.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top