Why are there two Stefan Boltzmann Laws in Reif's book?

AI Thread Summary
Reif's book "Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics" presents two versions of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, both involving T^4 but differing in constants. The formula on page 376 is (pi^2/15)*(kT)^4/(c*hbar)^3, while the one on page 388 is (pi^2/60)*(kT)^4/(c^2*hbar^3), with the latter being c/4 times the former. The distinction likely arises from one formula representing the intensity of emitted radiation and the other the energy density of radiation. This difference is crucial for understanding their applications in physics. The discussion highlights the importance of context when interpreting these formulas.
PatF
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In Reif's book Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics, he labels two formulas as the Stefan-Boltzmann Law. They are both involve T^4 but the constant is different. In one, on page 376, the law is given as (pi2/15)*(kT)4/(c*hbar)3.

The other, on page 388, is (pi2/60)*(kT)4/(c2*hbar3).

The second formula is c/4 times the first.

I have looked carefully through the text and I can't see why there should be a difference. What have I overlooked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks much! I just checked and I think you are right.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top