Why aren't hybrids used more often in spaceflight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aquitaine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Opinions Rockets
AI Thread Summary
Hybrid rocket engines combine liquid oxidizers with solid fuels, offering safety advantages and simpler technology compared to pure liquid or solid rockets. They provide a balance of thrust and specific impulse, but their specific energy is not always superior, which limits their widespread use. While hybrids can minimize mass and maximize energy, they push materials to their limits, raising concerns about failure margins. The complexity and mass of liquid systems, alongside the high thrust but low efficiency of solid rockets, highlight the trade-offs in propulsion technology. Despite their benefits, hybrids remain less common in orbital applications due to performance constraints.
aquitaine
Messages
30
Reaction score
9
What do you guys think about hybrid rocket engines compared with other the other kinds? What are the advantages of using one as opposed to a pure solid or liquid rocket?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One has to balance the energy requirements, duration, and complexity (and mass) of the fuel system.

Pure solids (fuel and oxidizer are intimately mixed) and the duration is limited by the mass of material and burn rate. They are generally high thrust, low Isp.

Pure liquid requires pressurized and possibly cryogenic storage, which adds to the fixed mass, as well as propellant mass.

Hybrids liquid(oxidizer)-solid(fuel), air(oxidzer)-solid(fuel) are probably desirable where safety is an issue. Liquid hydrogen is problematic and requires a pretty secure storage and handling system. I suspect hybrids have limited application.


The figure of merit for a propuslion system is the kW(thrust) / kg (mass of system) - a kind of specific propulsive energy.

Basically the goal is to minimize mass and maximize energy, but in doing so, one pushes the materials closer to their technical (physical) limits, i.e. decreased margin to failure.
 
So it is to get the most energy per mass out of it and reduce costs? If so why aren't hybrids used more today?
 
aquitaine said:
So it is to get the most energy per mass out of it and reduce costs? If so why aren't hybrids used more today?
Hybrids don't necessarily have the greatest specific energy.

They are relatively low tech compared to say a LOX/LH2 or LOX/kerosine systems.

Scaled Composites's SpaceShipOne uses a hybrid rocket - Nitrous Oxide oxidizes passes through a solid rocket motor.
http://www.scaled.com/projects/tierone/data_sheets/html/ox_tank.htm

SSOne only goes suborbital and then it glides after burnout out.

Going orbital is something entirely different, as is going supersonic like the SR-71 or X-15, or hypersonic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Back
Top