Why can't I show Newton's Third Law by different means?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the application of Newton's Third Law in a system of two blocks with opposing forces. The participant initially calculates the net force on the larger block as 2 Newtons but later finds discrepancies when calculating the force interactions between the blocks. It is clarified that the correct force exerted by the smaller block on the larger block is 1.5 Newtons, derived from treating the system as a whole. The participant struggles with obtaining consistent results when reversing the order of calculations for the forces between the blocks. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly accounting for all forces acting on each block to avoid errors in applying Newton's laws.
UseAsDirected
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small mass (1 kg) sits next to a larger mass (3 kg) on a table. A force of 5 Newtons pushes from left to right on the system while a force of 3 Newtons pushes from right to left on the system. Am I justified to conclude that the net force on the larger block has magnitude 2 Newtons?

Homework Equations


Why can't I get the same answer when I solve separately the force of block two onto block one (the larger onto the smaller)? I get the answer when I solve for F_12 and then state that F_21 is - F_12 by Newton's Third Law. But, why can't I do the reverse, F_21 solved first? Why do I get two separate answers?

The Attempt at a Solution


I correctly answer that the answer is no. In fact, the force on block two (the larger block) is actually 1.5 Newtons. First, I treat the whole as a single system to get the acceleration, which is

a = (F_right - F_left) / (m1 + m2) = 0.5 m/s^2

I then solve for the force of block one onto block two to get

F_12 = m2*a = [ m2 / (m1 + m2) ] * (F_right - F_left) = 1.5 Newtons (this is the answer)

To get the force of block 2 onto block one, I simply chant that because they are an interaction pair,

F_12 = - F_21.

[Onion]. BUT, if I start the problem solving for the force of block two onto block one, F21, I cannot get the answer. Actually, I get that the F_21 = 0.5 Newtons. This does not make any sense.

F_21 = m1*a = [ m1 / (m1 + m2) ] * (F_right - F_left) = 0.5 Newtons ? (why isn't it 1.5 N?)

My point is that I only get the right answer when I do it one way. When I try different ways to reinforce that I understand, being mathematically poetic, I quickly hit the skids.

Thank you and looking forward to see where I went wrong.Sidenote

Is it correct for me to write that the force on block one is

F_1 = F_right - F_21 = m1*a ?

and that that force on block two is

F_2 = F_12 - F_left = m2*a ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Which mass is left, which one is right?
UseAsDirected said:
F_12 = m2*a
This is not correct, as F_12 is not the only force acting on mass 2. There is another one.
The other derivation has the same issue, so you get two wrong answers.

UseAsDirected said:
Is it correct for me to write that the force on block one is

F_1 = F_right - F_21 = m1*a ?

and that that force on block two is

F_2 = F_12 - F_left = m2*a ?
That is a better approach and it should lead to a correct answer.
 
Hello,

Block one is the left block and block two sits to its right. Do you mean that this is wrong, too? 'F_12 = m2*a = [ m2 / (m1 + m2) ] * (F_right - F_left) = 1.5 Newtons. ' 1.5 Newtons is the solution at the back of the book.

Thanks.
 
1.5 N is certainly not the force between the blocks.
An easy cross-check: the right, heavy block has a force of 3 N towards the left side and the force |F_12| in the opposite direction. It is accelerating to the right. Clearly |F_12| has to be larger than 3 N.
 
Yes, but there is also a force of 5 Newtons pushing to the right (on block one side). The 3 Newton force is pushing leftward on block two.
 
Sure, the 5 N force makes sure that the block accelerates to the right. Details are not relevant for the argument that the mutual force between the blocks has to exceed 3 N.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top