Why Can't I Solve This Rotational Equilibrium Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a rotational equilibrium problem where the user struggles to find the correct force values. They initially derive equations based on force projections but arrive at an incorrect final answer of 6.59 instead of the book's answer of 11. Participants point out that the user is incorrectly calculating torque about a pivot point rather than an axis, leading to confusion in the calculations. They suggest reevaluating the torque contributions from both components of the force F_(T,1) and clarify that these components produce torques in opposite directions with varying distances. The user acknowledges the potential oversight but remains uncertain about the correct approach to resolve the problem.
ianb
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/9403/problempi4.png

I know this problem isn't hard, but I can't reach the final answer in the back.

OK, so if we project the forces along the x and y axis, we can easily conclude that:

F_(T,2) + F_(T,1) * sin50 = 10
F_(T,1) * cos50 = P

from here, though, I seem to be doing something wrong. The figure is in translational and rotational equilibrium, so net torque is zero. Let's take F_(T,2) as pivot. Then

F_(T,2)(0) + F_(T,1) * sin50(.30) = 10(.15)

Final answer will be

F_(T,1) = 6.59

where as the book's answer is 11. Of course I can't continue from here and find the other forces, so I'll just leave it at that.

Heh. Thanks all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What happened to the F applied at P in your torque equation?
 
It's along the x-axis, so it isn't calculated (it goes through the pivot).
 
ianb said:
It's along the x-axis, so it isn't calculated (it goes through the pivot).

No, OlderDan is right, you are taking moment (torque) about a point!, not about an axis (which is defined differently).

Unless you meant about the left down corner, which in that case you forgot one of the F(t,1) components torque. Maybe you should be more clear.
 
Last edited:
Wow, okay, then I guess we could say

F_(T,2)(0) + F_(T,1) * sin50(.30) + F_(T,1) * cos50(.30) = 10(.15)

but that will give F_(T,1) = 3.55, which is incorrect. Of course, I could have made something wrong there but there is a catch somewhere that I probably wasn't taught before.
 
Last edited:
ianb said:
Wow, okay, then I guess we could say

F_(T,2)(0) + F_(T,1) * sin50(.30) + F_(T,1) * cos50(.30) = 10(.15)

but that will give F_(T,1) = 3.55, which is incorrect. Of course, I could have made something wrong there but there is a catch somewhere that I probably wasn't taught before.
If you use the lower left corner for the torque calculation, the two components of F1 produce torques in opposite directions and have different perpendicular distances.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top