Why Can't I Use Standard Cosine Calculations for Non-Orthogonal Axes Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldfish9776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Force
AI Thread Summary
Standard cosine calculations cannot be used for non-orthogonal axes because Fu and Fv do not form a right triangle. The angles involved indicate that the triangle is oblique, requiring the use of the law of sines or the law of cosines for accurate calculations. The u and v axes do not meet at a right angle, which is essential for applying basic cosine rules. Instead, the problem can be approached as two equations in two unknowns, summing the x and y components of Fu and Fv. Understanding the distinction between oblique and right triangles is crucial for solving such problems correctly.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


in this question , why can't i find Fu = 600cos 30= 520N ?
why can't I find Fv = 600cos 120 = -300N ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Fu = 600cos 30= 520N ?Fv = 600cos 120 = -300N ?
[/B]
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0348 (2).JPG
    DSC_0348 (2).JPG
    38.2 KB · Views: 411
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


in this question , why can't i find Fu = 600cos 30= 520N ?
why can't I find Fv = 600cos 120 = -300N ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Fu = 600cos 30= 520N ?Fv = 600cos 120 = -300N ?[/B]
Well, for one thing, it appears that Fu and Fv are not the sides of a right triangle. It's hard to tell from the attached image.

For solving oblique triangles, the law of sines or the law of cosines must be used. For more information, see the article below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_of_triangles
 
SteamKing said:
Well, for one thing, it appears that Fu and Fv are not the sides of a right triangle. It's hard to tell from the attached image.
Why can't I do in this way?

For solving oblique triangles, the law of sines or the law of cosines must be used. For more information, see the article below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_of_triangles
 
SteamKing said:
Well, for one thing, it appears that Fu and Fv are not the sides of a right triangle. It's hard to tell from the attached image.

For solving oblique triangles, the law of sines or the law of cosines must be used. For more information, see the article below:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_of_triangles
Why can't I do in this way??
 
goldfish9776 said:
Why can't I do in this way??
As has already been explained, the forces Fu and Fv are not the sides of a right triangle.

The triangle which contains Fu and Fv has angles of 120°, 30°, and 30°. Do you see any right angles there?

Haven't you learned the difference yet between an oblique triangle and a right triangle?

The solution in your text clearly shows the use of the Law of Sines.

Please study the material I linked to previously. If you have any questions about that, I will be happy to answer them.
 
  • Like
Likes goldfish9776
goldfish9776 said:
Why can't I do in this way??
As was mentioned already, The u and v axes are not orthogonal (do not meet at a right angle). So you can't treat them as if they do.

If the using the laws of sines or cosines is throwing you off, you could approach the problem as two equations in two unknowns.

Fig1.png


Suppose that Fu and Fv are two vectors with the given directions and you need to find Fu and Fv such that they sum to a 600 N horizontal resultant. Impose axes x-y on the image such that the x-axis coincides with the horizontal 600 N force. Then write equations summing the x and y components of Fu and Fv accordingly.
 
  • Like
Likes goldfish9776
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top