Why can't sodium vapour lamp be used in spectrometer experiment

AI Thread Summary
Sodium vapor lamps produce a limited spectrum primarily consisting of yellow light, which restricts the ability to analyze various colors in a spectrometer experiment. In contrast, mercury vapor lamps emit a broader spectrum, including visible and ultraviolet light, allowing for a more comprehensive study of refractive indices across multiple colors. The presence of ultraviolet light in mercury vapor lamps poses eye safety concerns, necessitating precautions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using mercury lamps for experiments requiring a diverse color spectrum. Ultimately, the choice of lamp significantly impacts the quality and safety of spectroscopic analysis.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
i was working with a spectrometer and the aim of the experiment was to find the refractive index of a prism for various colors.
i was asked specifically to use mercury vapor lamp and was insisted not to use sodium vapour lamp.
why is it so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
harini_5 said:
for various colors.
How many colors are in a Na vapor lamp?
How many in an Hg
 
And the ones you can't see in Hg can be a eye safety concern. i.e. Ultraviolet.

Hopefully precautions are being taken.
 
mgb_phys said:
How many colors are in a Na vapor lamp?
How many in an Hg

sir can u please tell me the difference between the two spectra,interms of colors etc?
 
FG04_03.jpg

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~jimbrau/astr122/Notes/Chapter3_4.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
dlgoff said:
FG04_03.jpg

http://physics.uoregon.edu/~jimbrau/astr122/Notes/Chapter3_4.html"

A wonderful illustration of why mercury is preferable to sodium.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top