Why can't time-varying EM fields exist in a perfect conductor?

AI Thread Summary
Time-varying electromagnetic (EM) fields cannot exist in a perfect conductor, as per Maxwell's equations, but static magnetic fields can. This creates confusion when considering transformers with iron cores, where changing currents produce changing magnetic fields. Although iron is a good conductor, the magnetic field's penetration is limited by skin depth, allowing for time-varying fields within this boundary. Laminated iron cores are used in transformers to reduce eddy currents and mitigate the skin effect, enhancing performance. The discussion highlights the importance of material properties in electromagnetic applications, particularly in transformer design.
Very curious
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I understand that according to Maxwell's equations time-varying EM fields cannot exist in a perfect conductor (but static magnetic fields can). Also if you have a time-varying magnetic field you also have time-varying electric field and vice versa. And this knowledge is used to solve EM wave problems by fixing boundary conditions between conductor and dielectric mediums.

However, I get confused/baffled when I try to apply this boundary condition (that time-varying EM fields cannot exist in a conductor) to a transformer with iron core. I understand that a changing current creates a changing magnetic field (by Ampere's law?), which I assume is equivalent to a time-varying magnetic field, in the iron core.

Now, since the core is a good conductor shouldn't there be no EM field within it? But then, this would imply no time-varying flux within the iron core and transformer cannot work, which is obviously not true. Could someone kindly help me reconcile these two examples? Where did I go wrong? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In iron, the magnetic field falls off rapidly with penetration so that
|B|=\mu H_0 \exp[-z/2\delta], where
\delta=c/\sqrt{8\pi\mu\sigma\omega} (in gaussian units) is the
"skin depth". An integral of this B gives the flux.
 
Last edited:
Pam, thank you. Your answer may explain why the transformers are made of laminated iron cores. I just assumed the lamination was to reduce eddy currents but I guess it also is a way to get around skin effect of single core to carry more flux. One more thing, within the skin depth, the time varying E field exists also, right? I guess making transformers with superconductor cores may not be a good idea.
 
pam said:
In iron, the magnetic field falls off rapidly with penetration so that
|B|=\mu H_0 \exp[-z/2\delta], where
\delta=c/\sqrt{8\pi\mu\sigma\omega} (in gaussian units) is the
"skin depth". An integral of this B gives the flux.

Pam,
You make a good point about the problem with iron. Because of this, most transformer and motor laminations are made of silicon steel (often grain oriented), or cobalt alloys, or nickel alloys which, among other benefits, significantly raise the resistivity of the metal.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top