Why Can't We Rewrite Newton's Second Law as f = m*s/t^2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the incorrectness of rewriting Newton's Second Law as f = m * s/t^2. The primary reason is that acceleration (a) is defined as the change in velocity over time (dv/dt), not as distance (s) divided by time squared. When initial velocity is zero and acceleration is constant, the relationship can be expressed as f = 2ma/t^2, but this does not hold if acceleration varies or if initial velocity is not zero. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and conditions under which these equations apply. Overall, the fundamental principles of kinematics and dynamics must be adhered to for accurate formulations.
Abhijith S. Raj
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
We all know that f = m*a. But why can't we write this as f = m * s/t^2 ?
I know this is wrong. But what is the reason?? Need opinion on this.
Thankyou.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abhijith S. Raj said:
We all know that f = m*a. But why can't we write this as f = m * s/t^2 ?
I know this is wrong. But what is the reason?? Need opinion on this.
Thankyou.
You can't do it because ##\displaystyle \ a\ne \frac{s}{t^2} \ ## .
 
a = dv/dt. Ya now i get it.
 
Abhijith S. Raj said:
a = dv/dt. Ya now i get it.
If initial velocity is zero, and acceleration is constant, then the final velocity is v = at, but the average velocity is v/2 . The average velocity multiplied by time gives distance, so that s = (1/2)at*t = (1/2)at2, a = 2a/t2 .

Therefore, you could write f = 2ma/t2, provided that initial velocity is zero, and acceleration is constant.
 
  • Like
Likes deepakkumaar97
Thanks
 
if accelaration is not constant then?
 
akashpandey said:
if acceleration is not constant then?
Then, ... all bets are off. That's also true if the initial (or final) velocity isn't zero.
 
sorry but i don't understand.
please can u tell this mathematically. pleasezx
 
Back
Top