Why Copper is a Better Heat Conductor than Iron

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the reasons why copper is considered a better conductor of heat compared to iron. Participants explore various aspects of thermal conductivity, including the roles of electron movement and lattice vibrations, while also touching on related concepts from chemistry and atomic structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that heat conduction in solids involves both lattice vibrations and electron conduction, making it complex to determine which material is a better thermal conductor.
  • One participant notes that iron forms ions more readily than copper, questioning why it is not a better conductor of heat.
  • Another participant explains that conductivity in metals is influenced by resistance, which is affected by the rigidity of the molecular structure, indicating that softer metals like copper have lower resistance.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of metallic bonds in copper compared to other metals, with some participants mentioning that the weak metallic bonds contribute to copper's high ductility and conductivity.
  • Several participants express confusion about the differences between metallic, covalent, and electrovalent bonds, indicating a need for clarification on these concepts.
  • Participants reference the 2n² rule for electron configuration and discuss the notation used for electron shells, indicating a broader interest in atomic structure and chemistry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons behind copper's superior thermal conductivity compared to iron. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the factors influencing thermal and electrical conductivity in metals.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the properties of metals, the nature of bonds, and the complexities of thermal conduction, which are not fully resolved. There are also references to external resources that participants suggest for further exploration of related topics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and individuals interested in materials science, physics, and chemistry, particularly those seeking to understand the principles of thermal conductivity and atomic structure.

sankalpmittal
Messages
785
Reaction score
27
Hii , i am new in this forum . I am in class 10th and my name is Sankalp . I have a question :

Can you tell me why copper is better conductor of heat than iron ??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sankalp! Welcome to PF! :smile:

In an insulator, there are no free electrons, and heat is conducted only by transfer of vibrations from one molecule to another.

In a conductor, these molecular vibrations also occur, but there is a far greater effect, of heat being conducted by movement of the electrons throughout the material (the "electron fluid").

For the same reason, the materials which are good conductors of heat are also good conductors of electricity … for example, silver is slightly better than copper at both :approve:, and iron is a lot worse. :redface:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduction_(heat)#Overview" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know this . The theory of electron fluid !
But if iron forms ions more readily than copper then iron must be better conductor of heat but its not so .

Whyy ?
 
The heat conduction in solids may be due to both lattice (ions) vibrations and electron conduction.
So in general is not a simple matter to say which material is a better thermal conductor.
For metals both electric and thermal conduction is strongly related to the free electrons and less to ions.
 
nasu said:
The heat conduction in solids may be due to both lattice (ions) vibrations and electron conduction.
So in general is not a simple matter to say which material is a better thermal conductor.
For metals both electric and thermal conduction is strongly related to the free electrons and less to ions.

Then what is it special in copper to make it better conductor than iron ?

Please do add me too .
 
conductivity (both thermal and electrical) in metals depends on its resistance, and resistance comes mostly from the rigidity of the molecular structure (if molecules won't get out of the way of electrons, they slow down, so hard metals have higher resistance than soft metals) … see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper#Physical" :wink:
This is because the resistivity to electron transport in metals at room temperature mostly originates from scattering of electrons on thermal vibrations of the lattice, which are relatively weak for a soft metal.​

the softness is caused by the weakness of the metallic bonds … in copper (and silver and gold), they are not covalent (because those elements have a complete d-shell and only one s-electron on top, see image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electron_shell_029_Copper.svg" ) …
Contrary to metals with incomplete d-shells, metallic bonds in copper are lacking a covalent character and are relatively weak. This explains the low hardness and high ductility of single crystals of copper.

Copper, silver and gold are in group 11 of the periodic table, and they share certain attributes: they have one s-orbital electron on top of a filled d-electron shell and are characterized by high ductility and electrical conductivity. The filled d-shells in these elements do not contribute much to the interatomic interactions, which are dominated by the s-electrons through metallic bonds.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
conductivity (both thermal and electrical) in metals depends on its resistance, and resistance comes mostly from the rigidity of the molecular structure (if molecules won't get out of the way of electrons, they slow down, so hard metals have higher resistance than soft metals) … see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper#Physical" :wink:
This is because the resistivity to electron transport in metals at room temperature mostly originates from scattering of electrons on thermal vibrations of the lattice, which are relatively weak for a soft metal.​

the softness is caused by the weakness of the metallic bonds … in copper (and silver and gold), they are not covalent (because those elements have a complete d-shell and only one s-electron on top, see image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electron_shell_029_Copper.svg" ) …
Contrary to metals with incomplete d-shells, metallic bonds in copper are lacking a covalent character and are relatively weak. This explains the low hardness and high ductility of single crystals of copper.

Copper, silver and gold are in group 11 of the periodic table, and they share certain attributes: they have one s-orbital electron on top of a filled d-electron shell and are characterized by high ductility and electrical conductivity. The filled d-shells in these elements do not contribute much to the interatomic interactions, which are dominated by the s-electrons through metallic bonds.​

ummm What are metallic bonds and how they differ from covalent or electrovalent bond ??

Which are real s,p,d,f or k,l,m,n ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
sankalpmittal said:
ummm What are metallic bonds and how they differ from covalent or electrovalent bond ??

oooh, that's chemistry, I've no idea :redface:

you'll have to look it up! :smile:
Which are real s,p,d,f or k,l,m,n ?

what's k,l,m,n ? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
oooh, that's chemistry, I've no idea :redface:

you'll have to look it up! :smile:
what's k,l,m,n ? :confused:
You mentioned metallic bonds in thermal conductivity :confused:
Hey tim , you must have studied the 2n^2 rule by neils bohr .

1st shell : K
2nd shell : M
and so on .I don't have any idea of s,p,d,f .

Do you know any site which can teach chemistry from sheer basics to advanced level ?

:smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ratnesh dubey said:
we gave more energy to any object then it is heated

yes , you're right .
 
  • #11
sankalpmittal said:
Hey tim , you must have studied the 2n^2 rule by neils bohr .

1st shell : K
2nd shell : M
and so on .

I don't have any idea of s,p,d,f .

ahh, you seem to be using the special X-ray spectroscopy notation …

for everything else, we use s p d and f

K L M and N refer to the number of shells (the l quantum number)

s p d and f correspond to the subscripts 1 2 3 and 4 (the n quantum number), eg L1 L2 L3

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_notation" for the conversion table

(now, why couldn't you have found that? :wink:)​

for a full explanation of s p d f, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_configuration#Notation"
Do you know any site which can teach chemistry from sheer basics to advanced level ?

:smile:

see this forum's "Math & Science Learning Materials" at https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=151" :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
ahh, you seem to be using the special X-ray spectroscopy notation …

for everything else, we use s p d and f

K L M and N refer to the number of shells (the l quantum number)

s p d and f correspond to the subscripts 1 2 3 and 4 (the n quantum number), eg L1 L2 L3

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_notation" for the conversion table

(now, why couldn't you have found that? :wink:)​

for a full explanation of s p d f, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_configuration#Notation"


see this forum's "Math & Science Learning Materials" at https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=151" :smile:




Are you from UK ??

In India we study the system like this :

The 2n^2 rule :

For eg . There is 1st shell then no. of electrons would be given by 2n^2 :

1. 2x1^2=2 electrons in K shell :
2. 2x2^2=8 electrons in L shell and so on .

Foe eg atomic number of hydrogen is 1 ie 1
and of magnesium is 12 : ie : 2,8,2 .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K