Chemistry Why Divide the Moles of K by 2 in Combustion Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
In combustion calculations for potassium (K), the number of moles of K is divided by 2 because the balanced reaction shows that two moles of K produce one mole of K2O. This stoichiometric relationship is crucial for accurately calculating the internal energy of formation for K2O. The calorimetry equation incorporates the heat absorbed by water and the calorimeter, and the factor of 2 ensures the correct amount of K2O is accounted for in the energy calculations. Understanding this stoichiometry is essential for solving combustion problems accurately. Accurate mole ratios are vital for precise thermodynamic calculations in chemistry.
Samuel1321
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A sample of K (s) of mass 2.740g undergoes combustion in a constant volume calorimeter at 298.15K . The calorimeter constant is 1849 J/K , and the measured temperature rise in the inner water bath containing 1450 of water is 1.60K
Calculate the internal energy of formation for K2O

Homework Equations


DeltaU combustion = -(M/m)(m(H2O)/M(H2O)C(H2O)deltaT + Ccal delta T)

The Attempt at a Solution



2K+1/2O2 --> K2O

I basically just plugged everything inside but I was off by a factor of 2. When I look at the the answer key, they divided the number of moles of K by 2, I'm not quite sure why do we need to divide the number of moles of K by 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How many moles of K2O produced per each mole of K?
 
Borek said:
How many moles of K2O produced per each mole of K?

2, I think I get it now, thanks!
 
Samuel1321 said:
2

Quite the opposite!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top