Why Do Anions Increase in Size and How Are Ionic Compounds Named?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennington
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding Ionic
AI Thread Summary
Anions, such as chloride, increase in size due to increased electron-electron repulsion from the additional negative charge when they achieve a full valence shell. This phenomenon occurs without the addition of new electron shells. When naming ionic compounds that include polyatomic ions, the convention is to name the cation first, regardless of whether it is a metal or not, followed by the anion. For example, (NH4)2CO3 is correctly named ammonium carbonate, as ammonium acts as the cation in this context. Understanding these naming conventions clarifies the structure and properties of ionic compounds.
bennington
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
1. Why do anions, such as the chloride anion, increase in size when they achieve a full valence electron shell? This does not make sense to me because there is no new shell that is added.
2. How would you name ionic compunds involving polyatomic ions? My book says that (NH4)2CO3 would be ammonium carbonate. This also does not make sense to me because ammonium is not a metal , so there is no reason that it should go first.

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. There's an increased electron-electron repulsion due to the extra negative charge, thus more repulsion and increased atomic size.
2. I think you're thinking "ionic" too specifically to only "metal" ions. Cations are normally metals, but not all of them. Normally, naming ionic compounds with radicals are just simply naming the cation, (the charge if its multivalent), and the anion after it; it has nothing to do with metals or gases. And that's how ammonium carbonate should be named, so there's nothing wrong with the textbook.

Hope it helps~! =)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top